Why Hitler still finds admirers in Pakistan

Admiration for Adolf Hitler should be morally unthinkable anywhere. Yet in parts of Pakistan, his name still surfaces in conversations with a strange tone of respect. The reaction can be startling for Europeans who encounter it. The German journalist Hasnain Kazim described precisely this experience in a widely discussed essay in Der Spiegel, where he wrote about repeatedly hearing Pakistanis speak of Hitler as if he were a bold or admirable historical figure.The encounters he describes are uncomfortable in their casualness. In one instance, a barber styling his hair remarks approvingly that he resembles Hitler. Taxi drivers and acquaintances bring up Hitler in conversation with Germans, assuming it will be taken as a compliment rather than an insult. The tone is not always ideological. Often it is simply admiration for what they imagine to be a powerful leader who stood up to Western powers.That perception rests on a deeply distorted understanding of history. In many of these conversations Hitler appears not as the architect of genocide, but as a figure associated with strength, discipline and defiance. The Holocaust is rarely mentioned. The scale of Nazi crimes is either unknown or ignored. Instead, Hitler becomes a vague symbol of power.The essay recounts one particularly surreal image from Islamabad: a luxury car carrying a swastika sticker alongside the words “I like Nazi.” The symbolism appears almost casual, stripped of the horror that it carries in Europe. What shocks Germans encountering such moments is not simply the presence of Nazi imagery but the absence of shame surrounding it.The roots of this phenomenon are complicated but not entirely mysterious. Anti-Western sentiment has long shaped political narratives in Pakistan, particularly those rooted in resentment toward former colonial powers and contemporary global politics. In that emotional landscape, figures who are perceived to have challenged Western dominance sometimes acquire an undeserved aura of admiration. Hitler is occasionally inserted into that narrative as a supposed opponent of Britain and the West, even though the historical reality is far more complex and morally catastrophic.Another factor is the persistence of conspiratorial thinking and antisemitic tropes. In some discussions Hitler appears as a figure connected to hostility toward Jews and Israel, particularly in conversations shaped by anger over the Palestinian issue. In such contexts the Holocaust fades from view and the dictator becomes a symbol in a political story that has little to do with the reality of Nazi Germany.This distorted memory is not unique to Pakistan. Around the world, historical figures sometimes become detached from the events that defined them. Distance, ignorance and grievance can transform villains into caricatures. What remains is a simplified image of power without the moral weight that should accompany it.The disturbing element lies in the casualness. Hitler is sometimes invoked as a rhetorical flourish or a symbol of strong leadership rather than as the man responsible for one of the worst crimes in human history. When that happens, the historical context collapses. The genocide, the ideology and the devastation of the Second World War vanish from the conversation.The essay captures this unsettling contrast. For Germans, Hitler represents an enduring national trauma and a warning about the dangers of extremism. In some parts of Pakistan, however, the same name appears stripped of its historical meaning and recast as a figure of exaggerated strength.That gap in historical memory illustrates how easily symbols can travel across cultures while losing the reality that gave them meaning. Hitler becomes less a historical figure and more a mythological one, shaped by hearsay, resentment and incomplete education.The tragedy is that admiration of this kind often grows not from ideological commitment but from ignorance. When history is poorly understood, the past becomes a collection of symbols rather than lessons. In that environment even the darkest figures can be misunderstood as heroes.The uncomfortable truth revealed in the essay is therefore not simply that Hitler has admirers in Pakistan. It is that admiration can exist without a clear understanding of what Hitler actually did. When historical knowledge fades, even the most obvious villains can be recast in the imagination as symbols of strength.And that, perhaps, is the most disturbing lesson of all.