As the results of local weather change and a world pandemic made more and more clear that the planet was in deep trouble, a lot of the world enthusiastically turned its eyes to 3 internationally well-known billionaires becoming a member of an area race. They promised to show off-Earth tourism into a brand new trade for his or her fellow superrich; to create “a future the place thousands and thousands of individuals are residing and dealing in house for the good thing about Earth” and “to maneuver industries that stress Earth into house” (Blue Origin 2021, para. 1). The extraordinary worldwide press protection of the efforts of Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, and Elon Musk in 2021 grew to become a central web site for the discursive manufacturing of fierce competitors amongst white, middle-aged, male entrepreneurs of their pursuit of extra-terrestrial energy, glamour, and new sources of capital.
They’ve been taken to be not solely terribly rich but additionally the final word picture of the profitable, individualistic neoliberal self outlined by Dardot and Laval (2013), thriving within the up to date capitalist society whereas notably (re)producing the trendy assumption that people maintain sovereignty over all parts on Earth (Wendt and Duvall 2008). Remarkably, the discursive account of the house race has been a lot personalised within the names of the businessmen behind the non-public spaceflight firms concerned, as they had been made the protagonists of their endeavours to succeed in house (Rincon 2021; Kluger 2021). These similar private initiatives, nevertheless, had been supposedly aimed toward inaugurating a brand new period for humankind, significantly in its relationship with nature. It follows that one of many central elements permitting for the spectacularization of the billionaires’ house race is the worth posed to particularly Western conceptions of subjectivity underpinning the concepts of what’s the function of people on Earth and, significantly, of how a person alleged to be unlimitedly highly effective would act in direction of nature and different people.
The ability assigned to those businessmen could also be argued to be primarily enacted in two dimensions: first, by way of a drive for management over nature as a method of increasing humanity’s attain past Earth and additional manipulating pure parts in order that human hegemony just isn’t defied; secondly, by way of a extremely exclusionary logic inside human societies through which solely excessive financial energy may grant one the chance to flee the present risks to existence confronted by humankind on this planet. Each parts have been more and more garnering consideration from commentators, reminiscent of Bruno Latour (2018), and discovering their method into the social creativeness by way of discourse, e.g., studies by the worldwide media on anecdotes of the superrich and their methods to outlive apocalypse over the previous years (O’Connell 2018; Megía 2020).
Whereas a crucial evaluation of this case could possibly be carried out by way of a wide range of frameworks – most prominently the post-human flip in political idea and its intersections with the critique of neoliberal values and practices (Zolkos 2017), this work will achieve this by benefiting particularly from indigenous contributions to Worldwide Relations labelled below the identify of Buen Vivir (or Dwelling Nicely) as a crucial moral framework. As they entail a radically completely different conception of the place of a person and their subjectivity, such concepts instantly replicate on what’s taken to be people’ moral relationship to nature and each other.
By sourcing from ancestral concepts and practices (Acosta 2017; Lightfoot and MacDonald 2017), Buen Vivir supplies worthwhile and traditionally missed foundations if people are to reposition themselves and face the environmental challenges brought on by capitalist modes of manufacturing, consumption, and management over nature. In keeping with Acosta (2017), these views are enticing for that goal in as a lot as they resist capitalist dominance and stand for a communal lifestyle, as an alternative of a extremely anthropocentric, individualistic, and utilitarian one. Buen Vivir’s various conceptualizations of subjectivity are of explicit curiosity for this work, since they assume that “human beings should not remoted people, as we type a part of each a social and a pure group” (Acosta 2017, 2605) anticipated to reside in concord with one another and nature as properly.
By wanting on the case of the billionaires’ house race, this work will critically study the 2 above-mentioned dimensions (drive for management over nature and social exclusion amongst people), by way of which Western notions of subjectivity cultivated by way of modernity and contemporality are (re)produced. One after the other, it would first current how they’re enacted within the chosen case whereas in search of to show the distinction between their normative premises and Buen Vivir’s understanding of what a super particular person is and the way one pertains to nature and different human beings in a group. The overarching objective is to point out through which methods the ideas of Buen Vivir, and significantly the notion of harmonious life, is perhaps deployed to provide a critique of the billionaires’ race to house. The latter is taken to be a illustration of how trendy subjectivity, and its up to date enactment by the neoliberal self in Western capitalist societies, is a central issue to account for the present hegemonic understanding of what’s the human place on this planet.
Manipulating and taming nature: the final word energy of the trendy man
In a time when nearly something will be became a spectacle, it could come as no shock that the guarantees of three billionaires to succeed in house by their very own means can be adopted simply as a actuality present. In July 2021, worldwide media turned its consideration to the launches of two spacecraft boarded by Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos inside 9 days, whereas Elon Musk’s efforts to succeed in house had been equally saved below the highlight.
The flights might need served as advertising campaigns by Branson’s Virgin Galactic and Bezo’s Blue Origin aimed toward rising the favored attraction of a brand new luxurious tourism enterprise. Nonetheless, the alleged goal of all three billionaires engaged within the present house race is to broaden people’ grip past Earth in ways in which may give them the flexibility to govern parts of nature in house and even construct new types of life (Hiltzik 2021). Certainly, Blue Origin lists as two of its central targets to create “a future the place thousands and thousands of individuals are residing and dealing in house for the good thing about Earth” and “to maneuver industries that stress Earth into house” (Blue Origin 2021, para. 1), whereas Bezos himself reportedly held the view that “Earthly civilizations are headed for an energy-supply disaster that may solely be solved by harnessing extraterrestrial sources” (Wattles 2021, para. 7).
The plausibility of those initiatives is to not be thought-about by this work, as its curiosity lies within the normative premises and implications of the discourse they advance. It’s argued right here that billionaire house racers are assigned energy by way of their skill to fulfil a private and collective drive for management over nature.Consequentially, they turn into celebrated for his or her potential skill to broaden humanity’s attain past Earth and additional manipulate non-human parts in a time when the planet’s well being poses main challenges to present modes of manufacturing and consumption. Such human need for management and manipulation as it’s enacted by billionaire house racers could also be understood by way of the Western subjectivity that has risen in modernity and is constantly enacted in contemporality.
Wendt and Duvall (2008) famously argued that students have largely missed the truth that trendy sovereignty is taken to be solely anthropocentric, that means that people are considered the only holders of cognitive capability and subjectivity, in opposition to non-human parts reminiscent of animals and nature. Though this may appear at first like an nearly apparent assumption ensuing from frequent sense, the authors refute that understanding and maintain that anthropocentric sovereignty is traditionally contingent on a human-centred undertaking that defines the practices of our time, significantly as to how we conceptualize information and represent practices of governmentality. It follows that people are given energy by way of their placement on the very centre of recent rule (Wendt and Duvall 2008).
It seems, nevertheless, that such a privileged, highly effective place occupied by people in trendy thought is being more and more introduced into query by the results of its personal practices, significantly by anthropogenic local weather change, as Leduc (2014) argues. This disempowering shift has not solely introduced emotions of hysteria and uncertainty, however it has additionally been difficult the trendy assumption that people are separated from the remainder of nature and maintain management over it (Leduc 2014). Constructing on the work of Latour, Leduc (2014) writes that we’re being taken again to a spot of fragility and, consequently, being challenged to alter the way in which we predict and reside with nature.
Nonetheless, the efforts of billionaire house racers appear to level in the other way. They defy the constraints being imposed on anthropocentric sovereignty by taking human management over nature to a subsequent degree and even assuming that house’s possession is perhaps claimed by humankind. By reaching management over Earth and past, these businessmen take the lead in safeguarding people’ supposed pursuits, which could additionally merely be translated into the upkeep of present modes of capitalist manufacturing and consumption. Branson has certainly written that “house belongs to all of humanity” (Branson 2021) and that “exploring house will present humanity with a wholly new perspective of our valuable planet” on Twitter (Branson 2019). Bezos, in flip, has predicted a future the place people would set up colonies in house by residing in cylinders the place Earth situations can be artificially recreated, permitting thousands and thousands of individuals to reside and be born (Ma 2019; Hartmans 2021). Alongside the same vein, Musk has turn into well-known for his ambitions to arrange a colony of one million individuals on Mars by the 2060s (Drake 2016) whereas arguing that
“the way forward for humanity is basically going to bifurcate alongside considered one of two instructions: both we’re going to turn into a multi planetary species and a spacefaring civilization, or we’re going be caught on one planet till some eventual extinction occasion.”
Drake 2016, para. 7
The above-described discourse could also be learn as a considerably excessive type of anthropocentrism that sees no limits to human-led development, thereby reproducing a particularly trendy understanding of progress fueling capitalist societies. That is the rationale that a number of other ways of considering, together with the broad set of concepts from Latin America gathered below the identify of Buen Vivir, have focused by proposing completely different views of what’s the relationship between people and Nature, in addition to amongst people themselves. In that sense, Acosta (2017) argues that Buen Vivir turns into a beautiful various to capitalist dominance as a extremely anthropocentric and utilitarian system, one which entails a restricted understanding of improvement based mostly on materialist values.
Although Buen Vivir serves as a label for a number of indigenous concepts sourced from completely different locations and communities in Latin America, the philosophies that fall below the time period are introduced collectively by a couple of moral views on improvement (Gudynas 2011, 445). One of the distinguished of them is its proposed alternative of anthropocentrism for biocentrism. As defined by Gudynas (2011), it consists in envisioning people and nature as members of 1 single group that should cohabitate in concord. Due to this fact, residing by Buen Vivir’s values would imply “re-establish[ing] our reference to Nature, based mostly on a relationship of respect, duty and reciprocity, and the essential precept of relationality” (Acosta 2017, 2610). Constructing on the work of sociologist Simón Yampara and his understanding of the idea of suma qamaña, which can be translated as Buen Vivir’s important paradigm, Gudynas (2011) writes:
“Yampara understands that the suma qamaña just isn’t restricted to materials well-being, as expressed within the possession of property or consumption on the coronary heart of capitalist societies, however is a harmonious steadiness between materials and non secular elements, which is just doable within the particular context of a group, which is social but additionally ecological. This social and ecological conception of group is linked to the Andean idea of the ayllu, the place well-being encompasses not solely individuals, but additionally crops and cattle, and the remainder of Nature. The classical Western dualism that separates society from Nature vanishes below this attitude, as one accommodates the opposite, and they aren’t separable.”
Gudynas 2011, 444
Yampara understands that the suma qamaña just isn’t restricted to materials well-being, as expressed within the possession of property or consumption on the coronary heart of capitalist societies, however is a harmonious steadiness between materials and non secular elements, which is just doable within the particular context of a group, which is social but additionally ecological. This social and ecological conception of group is linked to the Andean idea of the ayllu, the place well-being encompasses not solely individuals, but additionally crops and cattle, and the remainder of Nature. The classical Western dualism that separates society from Nature vanishes below this attitude, as one accommodates the opposite, and they aren’t separable. (Gudynas 2011, 444)
It follows that Buen Vivir’s moral framework establishes that people owe their duty to all members of their communities, notably together with parts of nature. Nature then is given an intrinsic worth and granted the standing of a topic (Gudynas 2011), stripping human beings of their sovereignty as described by Wendt and Duvall (2008). By taking this attitude under consideration, one might identify the logic behind the billionaire house racers’ discourse as not solely anthropocentric but additionally extremely self-interested and oppressive in direction of the ecological element of their communities: not solely is nature seen as an object that has been traditionally managed and exploited by human beings, however additionally it is one to be tamed by highly effective people who promise to duplicate life-enabling situations elsewhere if Earth is to turn into unliveable by people. That’s framed basically as a method to reverse the constraints imposed by nature on the infinite ambitions for development supposedly held by humankind as an entire — and, consequently, to objectify nature even additional to capitalism’s greatest comfort, as an alternative of adjusting human behaviour right into a extra sustainable method of current on the planet. It’s exactly such instrumental and manipulative rationality that Buen Vivir strikes away from by rejecting “the trendy stance that nearly all the things must be dominated and managed, both individuals or Nature, to turn into a method to our ends” (Gudynas 2011, 445).
Buen Vivir’s approaches are normally fairly regionally bounded as to what issues the connection between people and their territories, however additionally they entail a non secular understanding of the planet as Pacha Mama, or Mom Earth (Acosta 2017; Gudynas 2011). Socio-ecological communities are anticipated to reside in concord and, due to this fact, in a complementary relationship with Pacha Mama, as put by Acosta (2017). What’s discovered within the billionaire house race is, in flip, a globally oriented rationale, in response to which people have already got all the planet as an object of their possession that matches their fingers. People are actually, so the story goes, coming into a brand new age that may increase even additional the variety of parts of nature to be manipulated by them. There’s, nevertheless, no moral place in direction of nature itself within the above-described discourse, however solely to human existence (but a extremely selective one, as the following part will argue) and, much more importantly, to the upkeep of capitalist modes of manufacturing and consumption.
Whereas Buen Vivir takes a cosmological strategy and interprets life as a human-nature continuum by way of spirituality, the trendy neoliberal rationality as an alternative deifies the economic system because the means to cope with environmental points and maintain life (Acosta 2017). Within the case studied right here, we might even see that enacted by way of the celebration of privately owned, extremely worthwhile expertise as a instrument to safeguard human sovereignty. Moreover, the supposed path in direction of progress and improvement is supposed to be guided by people who embody the perfect neoliberal self par excellence, as this paper is but to argue. The concept of harmonious life amongst people and non-humans, as it’s conceptualized in Buen Vivir, is then subverted within the billionaire house race by a radical type of coercive administration of nature, one that’s aimed toward serving traditionally contingent functions re(produced) by neoliberal capitalism’s practices and discourses.
‘You guys paid for all this’: the perks of personifying the neoliberal self on Earth
A second dimension by way of which billionaire house racers are assigned energy is thru their higher place on a supposed planetary-level social hierarchy. Because the house owners of personal companies with international attain The billionaire’s house race is critiqued as being exclusionary and individualistic (ensuing from Western subjectivities) with the moral framework of Buen Vivir — or, because the story goes, firms about to attain a good bigger scale by way of house flying — these people could also be stated to not solely embody the above-described Western trendy subjectivity but additionally to personify its hegemonic up to date type, the neoliberal self. Apart from being terribly rich, they’re seen as profitable males thriving in up to date capitalist societies. They turn into the final word winners of worldwide market competitors and, due to this fact, reproduce Dardot and Laval’s (2013) neoliberal motive. Their consecutive victories and excessive financial energy grant them the legitimacy to cleared the path in direction of a brand new radical step for human progress and the chance to flee the present risks to existence confronted by humankind on Earth.
Dardot and Laval (2013) describe contemporality as the location of a brand new subjective norm through which society is conceived as an enterprise made up of enterprises. They argue that the discursive and institutional practices of the 20 th century have constructed a conception of people as enterprises residing in fixed competitors with one another. In that account, the neoliberal self is thus anticipated to be continually taking dangers and pursuing his self-interest to maximise desired outcomes, thus behaving as an entrepreneur of himself. The enterprise is taken to be a web site of particular person flourishing and self-realization the place the boundaries between the non-public and market spheres turn into blurry (Dardot and Laval 2013).
Entrepreneurial rationality produces a single discourse that connects all energy relations in neoliberal societies, rendering itself able to reaching all points of social and particular person existence (Dardot and Laval 2013). It’s in that sense that one might take a look at the case of the billionaire house race and its engendered discourse on three white, middle-aged, male entrepreneurs in search of extra-terrestrial energy, glamour and new sources of capital. The house race serves as a celebration of neoliberal subjectivity, as it’s a globally spectacularized competitors happening solely amongst Bezos, Branson, and Musk as extremely highly effective people embodying their companies. They turn into seen as excellent people who, after enterprise dangers and accumulating victories all through their lives and careers in a neoliberal setting, are actually participating in an final journey that defies pure forces and constraints imposed on people by nature.
The above-described picture of self-made, aggressive, courageous, resourceful males could also be argued to supply billionaire house racers with the makings to be acknowledged as profitable manterpreneurs (Dardot and Laval 2013). After efficiently pursuing their self-interests, they turn into rightfully empowered to maintain doing it even additional – and, in the end, to steer the trail in direction of a brand new age on behalf of humankind. There’s no indication that this path, nevertheless, is meant to equally profit all humankind, however solely a particular share of superrich individuals who might afford the chance to flee the risks skilled on Earth sooner or later. At current, such exclusionary logic is carried out by the celebration of the neoliberal self represented by superrich males. They stand economically and socially above the working courses and supposedly get to enormously revenue from this workforce as a result of they’ve made their method by way of the liberal market. Famously, Bezos thanked Amazon’s workers and clients in an interview shortly after touchdown again on Earth by saying “you guys paid for all of this” (as cited in Gilbert 2021, para. 2), in a reference to an area journey estimated to have price a whole lot of thousands and thousands of {dollars} (Gilbert 2021).
Buen Vivir’s views convey to the fore the problematic exclusionary, individualistic stance embedded within the neoliberal subjectivity described above. Its philosophies are constructed on collective expertise (Acosta 2017) and think about that well-being can solely be achieved by way of the group (Gudynas 2011). People are alleged to reside in concord with one another inside a group simply as a lot as communities, peoples and nations are anticipated to search out concord amongst themselves. As put by Acosta (2017), that is an moral framework through which caring for oneself and others turns into a method to succeed in a steadiness that prioritizes the copy of life over the copy of capital.
This conception of life, through which relationality performs an overarching function, suggests an infinite circulate of complicated interactions and exchanges. Dwelling Nicely is premised on giving and receiving, in an ongoing means of reciprocities, complementarities and solidarities. In different phrases, it takes the type of an moral perspective which should govern human life. (Acosta 2017, 2605)
Whereas Acosta (2017) factors out the relational points of Buen Vivir’s understanding of human relations, one should observe the shortage thereof within the billionaires’ house race. Though the discourse of Bezos, Branson and Musk conveys the message they will change life for all humankind, the neoliberal motive assumes that people must conquer their method right into a social place from which reaching for house is feasible. As soon as extra, the moral framework of billionaire house racers turns into slender, self-serving and exclusionary for contemplating they might rightfully thrive regardless of the struggling skilled by these round them. Or, maybe extra exactly, that thriving could also be achieved due to the exploitation imposed on others in socially unequal settings.
Whereas reflecting on Buen Vivir’s contribution to Worldwide Relations’ thought and observe, Acosta (2017) argues it’s crucial to show expertise right into a useful resource aimed toward serving communal wants and calls for, as an alternative of holding it as a instrument of capital accumulation. Such a slender conception of improvement, in spite of everything, has introduced the world to a crucial place concerning social and ecological issues. Buen Vivir centres its criticism round this exact same axis. Within the billionaires’ house race, the thought of a harmonious life is pushed away to get replaced by a aggressive life dominated by neoliberal motive and discursively celebrated by its practices and discourses. The stakes of such competitors are taken to a multiplanetary degree by way of a radically individualistic use of expertise by those that can afford it. The entrepreneurial rationality is prolonged to environmental discourse – and presumably to how we come to think about the way forward for humankind because it offers with a significant menace to its survival.
Conclusion
This paper has sought for example how the choice, indigenous contributions from Buen Vivir could also be deployed as a crucial moral framework for reflecting on particular conceptions of subjectivity made prevalent all through modernity and contemporality in Western thought. By entailing a radically completely different understanding of what’s the place of a person and their duties in direction of others and parts of nature, Buen Vivir stands in opposition to the trendy anthropocentric sovereignty critically conceptualized by Wendt and Duvall (2008) in addition to to the neoliberal self described by Dardot and Laval (2013).
The billionaires’ house race has been offered and interpreted as a radical stance by way of which these two modes of subjectivity turn into enacted and celebrated. Due to this fact, it supplies worthwhile perception into how their values are translated into observe and discourse at current – significantly, on this case, on how people are anticipated to behave in direction of nature and others if granted nearly limitless energy. The protagonists of this case are rendered highly effective by way of two dimensions. First, for his or her success in fulfilling a private and collective drive for management over nature. Taming non-human parts is taken to be in humankind’s greatest curiosity and required to safeguard trendy human sovereignty in entrance of the constraints imposed by nature, reminiscent of scarcity of vitality provide or the results of local weather change. Secondly, billionaire house racers turn into celebrated for his or her standing of winners in a aggressive life dominated by neoliberal rationality, to be then thought-about respectable holders of the privilege of main the way in which in direction of the conquer of off-Earth territory and of having fun with the perks ensuing from it.
Buen Vivir supplies a resourceful critique of the above-described premises and implications ensuing from Western conceptions of subjectivity by way of its overarching idea of harmonious life. By its biocentric strategy, it grants nature intrinsic worth and the standing of a topic of its personal (Gudynas 2011) built-in into the social-ecological communities the place people coexist, as an alternative of a mere object to be manipulated and tamed by human beings. People are anticipated to reside in concord with non-human parts of their environment and, extra abstractly, with Pacha Mama (Acosta 2017). The philosophy of Buen Vivir, due to this fact, strips people from their trendy anthropocentric sovereignty and permits one to see the logic behind the house race as self-interested and oppressive in direction of the objectified ecological parts on Earth.
Moreover, Buen Vivir’s relational character brings to the fore the moral issues of the exclusionary, individualistic logic of neoliberal subjectivity and its entailed understanding of people as enterprises continually in search of to maximise their private outcomes. Nicely-being can solely be achieved by way of the group, and all members should look after one another to succeed in a steadiness that enables life to flourish over capital (Acosta 2017). Within the billionaires’ house race, nevertheless, the neoliberal motive assumes that people must conquer their method right into a social place from which reaching for house turns into doable — which might certainly miss most of humankind. The logic of giving and receiving are suppressed by profitable and taking, whereas harmonious life is changed by aggressive life.
Bibliography
Acosta, Alberto. 2017. “Dwelling Nicely: concepts for reinventing the longer term”. In Third World Quarterly, 38 (12): 2600-2616.
Blue Origin. 2021. About Blue Origin. Blue Origin’s Official Web site. https://www.blueorigin.com/about-blue
Branson, Richard (@RichardBranson). “I’ve dreamed of changing into an astronaut since I used to be somewhat boy watching the moon landings. Exploring house will present humanity with a wholly new perspective of our valuable planet & will convey us all collectively to guard it http://apollo11movie.co.uk #MyApollo11 @virgingalactic.” Twitter, July 5, 2019. https://twitter.com/richardbranson/standing/1147066355155427328
Branson, Richard (@RichardBranson). “House is for all humanity, which is why we’re giving YOU the possibility to win 2 seats on one of many first @virgingalactic flights to house! ENTER NOW – all donations go to non-profit @spacehumanity: https://bit.ly/3wkWX8R @omaze #Unity22.” Twitter, July 12, 2021. https://twitter.com/richardbranson/status/1414394032868921347
Dardot, Pierre, and Christian Laval. 2013. The New Approach of the World on Neoliberal Society. New York: Verso.
Drake, Nadia. 2016. Elon Musk: A Million People May Stay on Mars By the 2060s. Nationwide Geographic. September 27, 2016. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/elon-musk-spacex-exploring-mars-planets-space-science
Gilbert, Ben. 2021. Jeff Bezos thanks Amazon workers and clients for paying for his jaunt to house: ‘You guys paid for all of this’. Insider. July 20, 2021. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-thanks-amazon-customers-for-paying-trip-to-space-2021-7
Gudynas, Eduardo. 2011. “Buen Vivir: In the present day’s Tomorrow”. In Growth, 54 (4): 441– 447.
Hartmans, Avery. 2021. Jeff Bezos predicts that folks will at some point be born in house and ‘go to Earth the way in which you go to, you understand, Yellowstone Nationwide Park’. Insider. November 12, 2021. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-humans-born-in-space-eventually-space-colonies-2021-11
Hiltzik, Michael. 2021. Column: The Bezos-Branson-Musk house race is a large waste of cash and scientifically ineffective. Los Angeles Occasions. July 6, 2021. https://www.latimes.com/enterprise/story/2021-07-06/jeff-bezos-richard-branson-elon-musk-space-race
Kluger, Jeffrey. 2021. The Jeff Bezos-Richard Branson House Race Is About Extra Than Two Billionaires’ Egos. Time Journal. July 9, 2021. https://time.com/6079195/bezos-branson-space-race/
Latour, Bruno. 2018. All the way down to Earth: Politics within the New Climatic Regime. Translated by Catherine Porter. English version. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Leduc, Timothy B. 2014. “Climates of ontological change: previous knowledge in present binds”.In WIREs Local weather Change,5:247–260. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.267
Lightfoot, Sheryl R. and David MacDonald. 2017. “Treaty Relations between Indigenous Peoples: Advancing World Understandings of Self-Willpower”. In New Diversities, 19 (2): 25-39.
Ma, Alexandra. 2019. Jeff Bezos desires floating colonies in house with climate like Maui all yr lengthy — right here’s what he thinks they’ll appear like. Insider. Might 10, 2019. https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-proposes-floating-colonies-with-weather-as-good-as-maui-2019-5?r=US&IR=T
Rincon, Paul. 2021. Jeff Bezos launches to house aboard New Shepard rocket ship. BBC. July 20, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/information/science-environment-57849364
Megía, Carlos. 2020. ‘El colapso’ tiene razón: así se están preparando los multimillonarios para el fin de la civilización. S Moda, El País. August 01, 2020. https://smoda.elpais.com/celebrities/multimillonarios-elites-bunkers-colapso-coronavirus-apocalipsis/
O’Connell, Mark. 2018. Why Silicon Valley billionaires are prepping for the apocalypse in New Zealand. The Guardian. February 15, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/information/2018/feb/15/why-silicon-valley-billionaires-are-prepping-for-the-apocalypse-in-new-zealand
Wattles, Jackie. 2021. Jeff Bezos is flying to house. Right here’s all the things you must know. CNN Enterprise. July 19, 2021. https://version.cnn.com/2021/07/17/tech/jeff-bezos-space-flight-walkup-scn/index.html
Wendt, Alexander and Raymond Duvall. 2008. “Sovereignty and the UFO”. In Political Principle, 36 (4): 607 – 633.
Zolkos, Magdalena. 2017. “Life as a Political Drawback: The Put up-Human Flip in Political Principle”. In Political Research Evaluation, 16 (3): 192–204.
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
