Ford Motor Co. plans to enchantment a $1.7 billion US ($2.2 billion Cdn) verdict towards the automaker after a pickup truck crash that claimed the lives of a Georgia couple, an organization consultant stated Sunday.
Jurors in Gwinnett County, simply northeast of Atlanta, returned the decision late final week within the years lengthy civil case involving what the plaintiffs’ legal professionals referred to as dangerously faulty roofs on Ford pickup vans, lawyer James Butler Jr. stated Sunday.
Melvin and Voncile Hill have been killed in April 2014 within the rollover wreck of their 2002 Ford F-250. Their kids, Kim and Adam Hill, have been the plaintiffs within the wrongful dying case.
“Whereas our sympathies exit to the Hill household, we don’t consider the decision is supported by the proof, and we plan to enchantment,” Ford stated in an announcement to the Related Press on Sunday.
Butler stated he was surprised by proof within the case.
“I used to purchase Ford vans,” Butler stated on Sunday. “I assumed no one would promote a truck with a roof this weak. The rattling factor is ineffective in a wreck. You would possibly as effectively drive a convertible.”
In closing arguments, legal professionals employed by the corporate defended the actions of Ford and its engineers.
The Michigan-based automaker sought to defend itself towards accusations “that Ford and its engineers acted willfully and wantonly, with a aware indifference for the security of the individuals who experience of their vehicles once they made these selections about roof energy,” defence lawyer William Withrow Jr. stated in his closing arguments, based on a court docket transcript.
The allegation that Ford was irresponsible and willfully made selections that put clients in danger is “merely not the case,” one other defence lawyer, Paul Malek, stated in the identical closing argument.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs had submitted proof of practically 80 related rollover wrecks that concerned truck roofs being crushed that injured or killed motorists, Butler’s legislation agency, Butler Prather LLP, stated in an announcement.
“Extra deaths and extreme accidents are sure as a result of tens of millions of those vans are on the street,” Butler’s co-counsel, Gerald Davidson, stated within the assertion.
“An award of punitive damages to hopefully warn individuals driving round within the tens of millions of these vans Ford offered was the explanation the Hill household insisted on a verdict,” Butler stated.
