In 1919, President Woodrow Wilson, architect of the post-war worldwide cooperative regime, acknowledged the next concerning financial sanctions: “A nation that’s boycotted is a nation that’s in sight of give up. Apply this financial, peaceable, silent, lethal treatment and there will likely be no want for power. It’s a horrible treatment” (Hufbauer et al., 2007, p. 1).
Advocates and sceptics alike, few right now agree on the prospect that sanctions could present an alternative choice to conflict. Nonetheless, the usage of sanctions as a deterrent and second-best different to army intervention has grow to be the coverage of selection in instances the place diplomacy is inadequate, and intervention is just too drastic. Subsequently, the usage of sanctions has been more and more topic to scholarly scrutiny. This scrutiny is especially related right now, as many Western states, with the EU and the US within the forefront, have imposed on Russia what is probably going essentially the most encompassing sanction regime since 1945.
This textual content seeks to analyse the at present imposed sanction regime from a important perspective and debate its shortcomings primarily based on the big literature on financial sanctions and the already observable results. I conclude that the sanctions are unlikely to supply any coverage concessions in step with the aims of the sender states, and will even produce developments in the wrong way, all of the whereas aggravating human struggling.
The idea of sanctions – deterrence, after which what?
Observing the results of sanctions isn’t any straightforward process. Baldwin (1985) notes that some results of sanctions could also be onerous or unattainable to watch, and the results they do produce aren’t essentially dramatic or instantaneous. One ought to, subsequently, be cautious in designating makes an attempt at influencing international coverage into dichotomies equivalent to “success” or “failure.” This article is going to not try at doing so however relatively purpose at gauging its effectiveness and level out the disconnect between empirical knowledge, idea, and the acknowledged targets of the senders.
Sanctions are generally claimed to be simpler within the menace stage than within the imposition stage (Drezner, 2003; Morgan et al., 2021). Robert Pape (1997) claimed that imposed sanctions by themselves work in lower than 10% of the instances. By his definition, targets should comply absolutely as a direct response to sanctions to be deemed profitable. Others, using wider thresholds of success, discovered that imposed sanctions are efficient round 35% of the time (Baldwin 1985; Hufbauer et al., 2007). Within the latter case, the definition of a efficiently imposed sanction is one which ends in at the least partial coverage change, in accordance with the acknowledged coverage aims of the senders. Almost about our case, this raises the query: What are the acknowledged coverage aims of the senders?
There have been differing claims as to what the targets of the sanctions are. In response to the French, it’s “the collapse of the Russian financial system,” whereas the UK state they’re imposed to “minimize off funding for the Russian conflict machine” (Lough, 2022; UK authorities, 2022). The President of the EU fee proclaimed they’re “designed to take a heavy toll on the Kremlin’s pursuits and their capacity to finance conflict,” whereas the Biden administration has not made a transparent coverage goal aside from punishment (EU Fee, 2022a). Evidently, there isn’t a clear unanimous consensus on the aim of the sanctions, however three implicit or express targets may be recognized for the aim of this evaluation:
- To inhibit the Russian conflict effort in Ukraine.
- Regime change.
- To considerably weaken Russian financial (and thereby political) energy.
These targets lay the muse for my evaluation, and the mechanisms by which they’re imagined to work will likely be elaborated on and mentioned individually. It ought to be underlined that evaluating such a dynamic state of affairs, with no historic precedent to scale, is a problem. The conclusions I arrive at and the empirical knowledge they construct on are all the time vulnerable to alter, and so they should, subsequently, be corroborated by others.
Halting the Russian conflict effort in Ukraine
There may be appreciable proof that sanctions usually tend to succeed with lesser coverage concessions than main coverage aims, and as regards to stopping army operations and ceding territory, sanctions have not often succeeded (Hufbauer et al., 2007). Sanctions are primarily an instrument that bites in the long term, but few adhere to the concept that the Russo-Ukrainian conflict will stay in its standard type for adequate time for the sanctions to have a decisive impact on the “army operation” (Baer et al., 2022). That is particularly so when Russia nonetheless has methods to avoid them (see part 5). If sanctions are alleged to inhibit the conflict effort, they have to considerably impair the Russian capacity to finance its army (see part 5) or incentivise Russia to hunt settlement sooner than deliberate.
Many debates on the sanctions on Russia deal with shifting the Russian price/profit calculus of sustaining a state of conflict (Baer et al., 2022; Rongved, 2022). The rationale is grounded in bargaining idea, which stipulates that peace is extra prone to be agreed upon when the prices of conflict, which many speculate have been underestimated by Russia, rise to the purpose the place a continued army operation is now not fruitful. Thereby, sanctions could have an impact by incentivizing Russia to hunt settlement sooner and with smaller calls for than deliberate.
Nonetheless, because the political prices of sustaining a state of conflict rise by the day, Russia is unlikely to ship its troopers again with out some significant territorial positive factors. If the fight was to stop right now, and we suppose Russia was left even with marginal territorial positive factors, the West would face a dilemma: One may both progressively alleviate among the sanctions, as after 2014, or preserve the total power of the sanctions at present utilized. It appears intuitive that assuaging sanctions just isn’t a politically viable possibility for the West in any practical final result of the conflict, because the demanded concessions voiced by the West are that the army operations stop, and all land occupied by Russian forces be returned to Ukraine (Council of the EU, 2022). Thus, Russia is able the place the prospect of lifting sanctions is incompatible with attaining any politically viable purpose in Ukraine and is, subsequently, unlikely to be incentivised to hunt settlement sooner or declare much less.
Baldwin (1985) additionally notes that the effectivity of sanctions relies upon as a lot on the goal’s perceptions because the devices used. That is maybe very true for a personalist dictatorship, outlined as a regime by which one highly effective particular person dominates the federal government equipment and its devices; a designation more and more utilized to Russia (Wig, 2022). Mearsheimer (2022), notes that Putin on a number of events has known as the alignment insurance policies of the West and Ukraine “an existential menace” to Russia. If one accepts this notion as true and never a constructed casus belli (which is definitely up for debate), the fee/profit calculus is now not related to debate, as no quantity of sanctions can distract Putin from acquiring existential safety for Russia.
Some level out {that a} potential “facet impact” of the sanctions might be that the shifted price/profit calculus may make additional aggression by Russia on different territories much less engaging (Rongved, 2022). However this isn’t to shrink back from the truth that the sanctions on Russia in 2014 did little to discourage the present coverage. As within the state of affairs in Ukraine, if all sanctions are expended and the prospect of them being lifted is unrealistic, Russia has no financial incentive to abstain from different “army operations” in its close to overseas, and the deterrent worth of sanctions is misplaced.
The prospect of regime change
In response to Oechslin (2014), democratisation and regime change is essentially the most frequent purpose of worldwide financial sanctions. Though not explicitly outlined by any nation formally, the purpose of forcing a regime change utilising sanctions has been voiced — though apparently by chance — by some larger officers of the sender nations, notably by the US president (Falconbridge et al., 2022; Bloom, 2022). Maybe essentially the most outstanding instance of complete sanctions with the purpose of regime change is the sanctions imposed on Iraq from 1990 to 2003, which, as an essential facet observe, “could effectively have been a mandatory reason behind the deaths of extra folks in Iraq than have been slain by all so-called weapons of mass destruction all through historical past,” in response to one estimate (Mueller & Mueller, 1999, p. 51). The sanctions didn’t trigger regime change, however relatively, in actual fact, strengthened the authoritarian grip on energy.
Two mechanisms have been voiced by the media concerning the potential of a sanctions-caused regime change in Russia. One is that adequate financial distraught could trigger mass public outrage and a violent overthrow of these in energy (bottom-up), generally referred to in academia as “the naïve idea of sanctions” (Galtung, 1967, p. 389; Rød et al., 2022). The opposite mechanism prevalent within the media is that Putin could also be overthrown by the political elite, by means of a “palace coup” (Bukkvoll, 2022).
Backside-up regime change
Sanctions have traditionally been notoriously weak in inducing each democratisation and regime change in authoritarian states, and will typically have an antagonistic impact by additional legitimizing and strengthening authoritarianism (Grauvogel & von Soest, 2013). Analysis on complete sanctions signifies that authoritarian regimes below sanctions achieve incentives to allocate rent-seeking alternatives to these supporting the regime as an alternative of directing efforts to the supply of public items for the plenty (Oechslin, 2014). Regimes could even go as far as to lower the provision of public items as a technique to intensify the prices of revolting, as was the case in Iraq (Oechslin, 2014). Whereas it is likely to be too early to state whether or not there’s an equal growth in Russia, the Iraq case stands as an illuminating historic precedent. Drezner (2021) factors out that though worldwide relations students are extra typically in disagreement than not, the literature on sanctions is unanimous on the hurt sanctions trigger to the civilian inhabitants of the goal nations. They’re prone to set off repression, corruption and backsliding on human growth metrics, however this doesn’t essentially entail outrage towards the federal government, nor lively makes an attempt at regime change.
As Galtung (1967) notes in his evaluation of the so-called naïve idea of sanctions, the “rally-round-the-flag-effect” tends to be ignored. Latest knowledge from the Russia-based unbiased polling centre Levada Middle (2022) contradicts the prediction of bottom-up regime change and signifies a substantial rally-around-the-flag impact within the presidential approval scores (see determine 1). This additionally mirrors the favored response after the annexation of Crimea. It is likely to be that the latest restrictions on freedom of speech are having an affect on the respondents, and one ought to observe that the ballot answering charges have sunk within the aftermath of those restrictions. Nonetheless, even with a considerable margin of error, these outcomes point out that mass protests are nowhere shut in the intervening time, regardless of stories of palpable detrimental humanitarian results (Kaner & Shamina, 2022).
Palace coup
Focused sanctions, a time period to explain sanctions that prohibit exercise for particular entities or people, can be a part of the sanctions on Russia. They’re typically heralded as essentially the most environment friendly type of sanctions, however there isn’t a robust proof that focused sanctions alone are extra profitable than complete sanctions (Drezner, 2011). Kaempfer and Lowenberg (1992) supply a theoretical argument suggesting that monetary sanctions are notably efficient once they “focus earnings losses on teams benefiting from the goal authorities insurance policies;” that’s, within the case of Russia, focusing on the oligarchs.
Nonetheless, Russia’s oligarchs aren’t a possible power of regime change (Soldatov & Borogan, 2022). Whereas a flip within the coverage trajectory of Russia would definitely profit the oligarchs, they’ve little leverage individually, particularly amongst those that don’t have any direct connection to Putin (Stanislav, 2017). Altering the established order necessitates cooperation amongst oligarchs who’re already fragmented and in fierce competitors, in an setting stricken by zero-sum interactions (one particular person’s positive factors are one other’s loss and vice versa). Whereas the oligarchs’ leverage is contingent on cooperation, this zero-sum aggressive kleptocracy results in an issue of collective motion. Allow us to additionally not overlook that the sanction regime of 2014 did little to incite regime change from the oligarchs, regardless of directing its most important efforts to harm them. Regime change with the oligarchs on the vanguard is, subsequently, unlikely.
One could argue a palace coup doesn’t essentially have to be orchestrated by the oligarchs — different actors such because the army or safety providers may effectively be the instigators. Nonetheless, it ought to be famous that the above-mentioned zero-sum aggressive setting goes past oligarchs. In response to Stanislav (2017), “particular person state workers in any respect ranges of the chief hierarchy view the rents they’ll extract from the financial system as a zero-sum sport” (p. 105). As such, this zero-sum nature may effectively be pathological for the military and safety providers, each of which are sometimes main actors in palace coups. And even within the unlikely case that the present Russian regime crumbles, democratization is simply one of many doable outcomes. Analysis on international pressure-induced regime change in personalist dictatorships observes it’s extra doubtless {that a} new dictatorship replaces the previous (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2015).
The petroleum drawback – bringing down the Russian financial system
Evidently, the sanctions imposed on Russia in 2014 weren’t adequate in inducing coverage concessions and have been a far cry from imploding the Russian financial system. Furthermore, analysts level towards them being a useful lesson for Russia in permitting them to witness the structural results of a comparatively cautious sanction regime on the Russian financial system. The 2 so-called ‘nuclear choices’ of the 2022 sanction regime, that’s, essentially the most damaging sanction packages the West can impose, have been recognized as these pertaining to finance and petroleum. Resulting from area constraints and the exceeding complexity of assessing the present monetary sanctions, the scope of this evaluation stays restricted to petroleum.
A standard declare within the sanction literature is that sanctions are more and more destabilising when the goal nation’s financial system relies on the exports of 1 or few items, particularly in personalist dictatorships (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2010). As delivering materials advantages to regime supporters typically derives from international income, when international income is minimize off, regime supporters are likely to withdraw their assist. That is notably related for Russia, which is each more and more designated as a personalist dictatorship, and whose petroleum exports account for ca. 43% of the worth of all Russian exports and 41% of federal finances revenues, as of January 2022 (Koning, 2022; OEC, 2022; МИНФИН, 2022). The Russian federal finances and the worth of its export is, thus, largely linked to the costs of those items. Inhibiting the export of those property is, subsequently, key in bringing the Russian financial system to its knees. Nonetheless, an essential exception from this statement is that sanctions not often destabilise dictatorships which can be additionally essential exporters of petroleum (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2015, p. 121). The first causes for this are that oil embargos create massive prices for the sender states, all of the whereas these not partaking in an oil embargo achieve entry to discounted oil (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2015).
There was initially an obvious lack of political will within the West to impose sanctions utterly stopping the imports of Russian petroleum, particularly within the EU. For nations equivalent to Hungary, Germany, and Italy, that is no shock, because the logistical difficulties and financial prices related to substituting a sizeable dependence on Russian pipeline fuel essentially make it troublesome to realize within the brief time period. The continued provide of fuel is key for the well being of many of those economies, whereas solely considerably essential for the Russian financial system: 43% of EU-consumed fuel derives from Russia, whereas roughly 25% of Russian fuel exports head to the EU (EU Fee, 2022b; OEC, 2022). Nonetheless, it ought to be famous that pure fuel “solely” accounts for 3% of the Russian export worth (OEC, 2022). Thus, the energy-economic relationship between sure EU members and Russia may be characterised as an asymmetrical dependency, one thing that has grow to be particularly obvious as Russia just lately minimize the circulation of fuel to Poland, Finland, and Bulgaria. Oil, however, contains a a lot bigger share of income at 35%, and may, subsequently, be the first vector of assault for the sanctions (OEC, 2022).
There are a number of issues with attempting to strangle Russian oil exports. Firstly, halting the exports utterly hinges on the willingness of China and different markets to adjust to Western will — an unrealistic proposition, in response to Chinese language state officers and IR students alike (Solar et al., 2022; Woo, 2022). Second, the Russian oil manufacturing and export capacity is a sizeable issue within the international oil market, and a sudden drop in provide or manufacturing has already produced appreciable instability within the value of oil. The uncertainty launched by the invasion led to a value improve from $78/brl in January, to a excessive of $127/brl in March, considerably stabilized round $100/brl as of July. Relying on the circumstances of OPEC, negotiations with Iran, and the flexibility to substitute Western demand for Russian oil, this development will likely be onerous to reverse because the Western imports of Russian oil are shut down by the top of 2022 (Rystad Power, 2022).
That is doubtless one of many key explanation why there was a palpable lack of political resolve within the preliminary EU response, whose ban on oil imports got here three months after the US. Looking back, this reluctance is comprehensible, because the unstable costs of petroleum-derived merchandise now start producing massive home prices for the sender states. With quickly rising inflation on high of inauspicious post-covid structural issues, the choice to halt Russian oil and petroleum imports could hang-out the EU for a while. Hufbauer et al. (2007) discover that sanctions that inflict home prices on specific home teams are detrimental to their effectiveness — particularly so when the sanctions embody retroactively cancelling current contracts, which one ought to “keep away from, in all however excessive conditions” (Hufbauer et al., 2007, p. 177). Together, these actions could trigger an incredible home backlash by affected companies and people.
Within the case of Iran, Iraq, and Venezuela, who’re or have been all below a Western-imposed sanctions regime whereas being main oil producers, neither of the nations’ economies imploded outright. Though their economies undoubtedly struggled, students level out that help from Russia and/or China is and was key for his or her continued survival (Baer et al., 2022). The state of affairs of Venezuela, Iran and Iraq largely mimics the place Russia right now finds itself: a big oil-producing nation instantly minimize off from swathes of multilateral financial cooperation, depending on the continued exports of petroleum and reliance on China and rising markets to fill the Russia-West commerce vacuum. As of Might, Rystad Power (2022) estimates that Russia’s annual oil-derived tax revenues will hit ranges 45% and 181% larger than in 2021 and 2020 respectively. There are nonetheless fewer nations which can be sanctioning Russia than these that aren’t, and Asian nations (notably, India) have already begun importing discounted Russian oil (Menon, 2022). However, as oil costs stabilise and the total weight of the sanctions start gnawing on the foundations of the Russian financial system, it would falter. However given the supply, time, and infrastructure to commerce with different non-Western markets, the sanctions stay unable to sufficiently harm Russian long-term energy for it to not be a substantial international political actor sooner or later.
Conclusion
On this textual content, I’ve analysed the at present imposed sanction regime from a important perspective and debated its shortcomings primarily based on the tutorial literature on sanctions and the already observable results. I’ve argued that the sanctions are unlikely to be efficient in acquiring three recognized implicit or express targets of the sender states:
Firstly, the sanctions are unlikely to cease the conflict or incentivise Russia to hunt settlement sooner than deliberate, as Russia is able the place the circumstances of lifting the sanctions are incompatible with attaining any politically viable purpose in Ukraine. Moreover, because the deterrent worth of sanctions is expended, Russia will doubtless not be as incentivised to abstain from future aggression on different territories.
Secondly, bottom-up regime modifications attributable to sanctions have few historic precedents, and in additional instances than not produce the alternative impact by strengthening the authoritarian regime. The appreciable rally-round-the-flag-effect already observable additionally signifies bottom-up regime change is unlikely. Furthermore, a palace coup is difficult as a result of zero-sum nature reportedly current within the govt political setting.
Thirdly, as there are nonetheless main financial actors prepared to commerce with Russia, the Russian financial system is unlikely to be sufficiently broken to have a devastating affect on its long-term place as a world political actor. As well as, the sanctions on oil and petroleum are starting to supply palpable home prices within the sender states.
An essential caveat to my textual content concerning the financial results is the shortage of study on the affect of economic sanctions, which is usually recognized with larger imposed sanctions success charges (Hufbauer et al., 2007, p. 47). Additionally, although doubtless stricken by methodological difficulties, additional evaluation can be wanted to estimate the affect on Russian army tools procurement to extra correctly assess the effectiveness of the sanctions with regard to the inhibition of conflict. Together with these features could have produced a distinct conclusion.
If the sanctions are as inefficient as I declare on this textual content, it’s pure to ask what another strategy might be. Many argue it’s the solely possibility out there to sign diplomatic discontent and essentially the most befitting punitive possibility, as put into phrases by a British diplomat: “there’s nothing else between phrases and army motion if you wish to deliver stress upon a authorities” (Marcus, 2010). In any case, the perennial query of “what else?” necessitates a deeper evaluation of the sanction regime and its results and outcomes than what has been supplied right here.
References
Baer, D., Bledowski, Ok., Cooper, R., Ehl, M., Fallon, T., Kitney, G., Kornblum, J., Meister, S., Ory, M., Pierini, M., Portella, C., Romanova, T., Steiner, T., Sus, M., Tomic, M. (2022, March 10). Judy Asks: Can Sanctions Finish Russia’s Conflict in Ukraine? Carnegie Europe. Retrieved from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/86606
Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Financial Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton College Press.
Bloom, D. (2022, February 28). UK clarifies it’s not attempting to deliver down Putin regime over Russia-Ukraine conflict. The Mirror. Retrieved from: https://www.mirror.co.uk/information/politics/uk-clarifies-not-trying-bring-26349409
Bukkvoll, T. (2022, February 24). På sikt kan krige true Putin-regimet. Dagsavisen. Retrieved from: https://www.dagsavisen.no/nyheter/verden/2022/02/24/pa-sikt-kan-krigen-true-putin-regimet/
Council of the European Union. (2022, April 8). Fifth bundle of sanctions in view of Russia’s army aggression towards Ukraine: EU adopts restrictive measures towards an extra 217 people and 18 entities. Retrieved from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/04/08/fifth-package-of-sanctions-in-view-of-russia-s-military-aggression-against-ukraine-eu-adopts-restrictive-measures-against-an-additional-218-individuals-and-18-entities/
Drezner, D. (2011). Sanctions generally sensible: Focused sanctions in idea and observe. Worldwide Research Assessment, 13(1). 96-108.
Drezner, D. (2021). The use and abuse of financial coercion. Overseas Affairs. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-08-24/united-states-sanctions
Escribà-Folch, A., & Wright, J. (2010). Coping with tyranny: Worldwide sanctions and the survival of authoritarian rulers. Worldwide Research Quarterly, 54(2). 335–359.
Escribà-Folch, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Overseas Stress and the Politics of Autocratic Survival. Oxford: Oxford College Press
European Fee. (2022a, February 24). Press assertion by President von der Leyen on Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/fee/presscorner/element/en/STATEMENT_22_1322
European Fee. (2022b, April 20) In focus: Lowering the EU’s dependence on imported fossil fuels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/information/information/focus-reducing-eus-dependence-imported-fossil-fuels-2022-apr-20_en
Falconbridge, G., Stewart, P., Value, M. (2022, March 27) Reactions to Biden saying Putin ‘can not stay in energy’. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/reactions-biden-saying-putin-cannot-remain-power-2022-03-27/
Galtung, J. (1967). On the results of worldwide financial sanctions: With examples from the case of Rhodesia. World Politics, 19(3), 378-416.
Authorities of the UK. (2022, March 15). Overseas Secretary proclaims historic spherical of sanctions on Russia. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/authorities/information/foreign-secretary-announces-historic-round-of-sanctions-15-march-2022
Grauvogel, J., von Soest, C. (2013). Claims to legitimacy matter: Why sanctions fail to instigate democratization in authoritarian regimes. GIGA Working Papers, 235.
Hufbauer, G., Schott, J.J., Elliott, Ok., Oegg, B. (2007). Financial Sanctions Reconsidererd. Washington, DC: Peter G. Peterson Institute for Worldwide Economics
Kaempfer, W, & Lowenberg, A. (1992). Worldwide Financial Sanctions: A Public Selection Perspective. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Kaner, J., Shamina, O. (2022 March 13). Russia sanctions: How the measures have modified day by day life. BBC Information. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/information/world-europe-60647543
Koning, J. (2022, March 9). Why Putin is Dropping – The Weak point of Personalist Dictatorship. PRIO Blogs. Retrieved from: https://blogs.prio.org/2022/03/why-putin-is-losing-the-weakness-of-personalist-dictatorship/
Levada Middle. (2022). Putin’s Approval Ranking. Retrieved from: https://www.levada.ru/en/scores/
Lough, R. (2022, March 1). French minister declares financial ‘conflict’ on Russia, after which beats a retreat. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/france-declares-economic-war-against-russia-2022-03-01/
Marcus, J. (2010) Evaluation: Do financial sanctions work? BBC Information. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/information/world-middle-east-10742109
Mearsheimer, J. (2022, March 3). Putin’s Invasion of Ukraine Salon | Ray McGovern, John Mearsheimer – Committee for the Republic. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppD_bhWODDc&t=0s
Menon, S. (2022, April 26) Ukraine disaster: Why India is shopping for extra Russian oil. BBC Information. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/information/world-asia-india-60783874
Mueller, J., Mueller, Ok. (1999). Sanctions of mass destruction. Overseas Affairs, 78(3), 43-53
Nyrup, J. (2022, March 7). Putin bør frykte kupp og revolusjon. Stavanger Aftenblad. Retrieved from: https://www.aftenbladet.no/utenriks/i/dnBEM1/putin-boer-frykte-kupp-og-revolusjon
Oechslin, M. (2014, December). Concentrating on autocrats: Financial sanctions and regime change. European Journal of Political Economic system, 36, 24-40.
Pape, R. A. (1997). Why financial sanctions don’t work. Worldwide Safety, 22(2), 90-136.
Rød, E., Dahl, M., Gjerløw, H., Fjelde, H. (2022, March 16). Et folkelig opprør kan bli Putins skjebne. NRK.no. Retrieved from: https://www.nrk.no/ytring/et-folkelig-oppror-kan-bli-putins-skjebne-1.15894900
Rongved, G. (2022, March 2). Europas syke, syke mann. Minerva. Retrieved from: https://www.minervanett.no/krig-russland-sanksjoner/europas-syke-syke-mann/400724
Rystad Power. (2022, Might 2). Lifting the curtain on Russia’s oil and fuel sectors that may herald an estimated $260 billion in 2022. Rystad.no. Retrieved from: https://www.rystadenergy.com/newsevents/information/press-releases/lifting-the-curtain-on-russia-oil-and-gas-sectors-that-will-bring-in-an-estimated-240-billion-in-2022/
Simoes, A. J. G, Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The Financial Complexity Observatory (OEC): An Analytical Device for Understanding the Dynamics of Financial Growth. Retrieved from: https://oec.world/en/profile/nation/rus?subnationalDepthSelector=productHS2
Soldatov, A. and Borogan, A. (2022, April 11). Might the Siloviki Problem Putin?. Overseas Affairs. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2022-04-11/could-siloviki-challenge-putin
Stanislav, M. (2017). The atlas that has not shrugged: Why Russia’s oligarchs are an unlikely power for change. Daedalus, 146(2), 101-112.
Solar, Y., Ivanov, P., Huang, Y., Repnikova, M., Wishnick, E., Chorzempa, M. (2022, April 7). What Classes Does China Take From Putin’s Conflict? Overseas Coverage. Retrieved from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/04/07/china-russia-putin-ukraine-war-lessons-taiwan/
Verder, D., Buyngwon, W. (2011). Why rewards are higher than sanctions. Economics and Politics, 23(2), 220-238.
Wig, T. (2022, February 24). Russland er blitt et klassisk diktatur. Forskning.no. Retrieved from: https://forskning.no/krig-og-fred-russland-statsvitenskap/russland-er-blitt-et-klassisk-diktatur/1985554
Woo, R. (2022, March 19). Chinese language official calls sanctions on Russia more and more ‘outrageous’. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/chinese-official-calls-sanctions-russia-increasingly-outrageous-2022-03-19/
МИНФИН / Russian Ministry of Finance. (2022, April 18). Quarterly report on execution of the federal finances. Retrieved from: https://minfin.gov.ru/en/statistics/fedbud/?id_65=119254quarterly_report_on_execution_of_the_federal_budget_starting_from_january_1_2011
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
