Index Investing News
Wednesday, May 28, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • World
  • Investing
  • Financial
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Property
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Home
  • World
  • Investing
  • Financial
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Property
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Index Investing News
No Result
View All Result

What GDP Figures Do Not Reveal

by Index Investing News
February 2, 2024
in Economy
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
Home Economy
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Janan Ganesh, an often original if not iconoclastic columnist, asked why bad governments such as populist ones don’t seem to undermine economic growth, at least in the short run (“Why Hasn’t Populism Done More Economic Harm,” Financial Times, January 23, 2024). This provides us with a good opportunity to review what GDP numbers cannot prove.

For seven or eight decades, it has been known to economists (at least to those who studied the issue) that, if GDP might help those who get more of it, it does not measure “social welfare” (sometimes called “aggregate utility”). There is much welfare-economics theory behind the reasons for this, but they can be intuitively rendered in a few more or less equivalent ways, or at least that’s what I will attempt to do. (The basic theory can be found in Paul A. Samuelson’s “Evaluation of Real National Income [Oxford Economic Papers, 1950] and Francis M. Bator’s “The Simple Analytics of Welfare Maximization” [American Economic Review March 1957].) Consider different descriptions of what happens after the government forces the economy to move on the production possibility frontier (PPF) by authoritatively deciding that more of something and less than something else will be produced:

  • Some consumers and possibly some workers and owners of capital are harmed. In economic jargon, the move is not a Pareto improvement. Since some gain and others lose, there is no social-scientific (economic) way to tell if “social welfare” has increased or decreased, whatever the GDP figures show. There is typically no practical way, nor even (as shown in the Samuelson article cited above) theoretical formulas, to compensate those who are harmed. Ultimately, the cause lies in the impossibility of interpersonal comparisons of utility. (Of course, if everyone gets a higher real income with nothing else changed, we would know that everyone’s utility, or individual welfare, has increased, and thus “social welfare” too.)
  • Prices, which serve to add apples and oranges to make up GDP, lose their previous correspondence with consumer valuations.
  • It is not consumer sovereignty that determines what will be produced in the economy, but government rulers or some majority. Imagine, for example, that real GDP grows at 10% and that all the growth accrues to the king, all other individuals being impoverished: “the economy” has improved, but there is no scientific way to establish that welfare has increased.
  • The free interaction between demanders and suppliers is prevented from determining what “economic growth” is made of or what it is used for. To see this in a slightly different way, imagine that as the year 2023 progressed, the state continuously seized all its subjects’ incomes over subsistence level and invested the proceeds in a portfolio mirroring the S&P 500. Given that the latter increased by 24% during the year and assuming that the government invested the money as it seized it regularly (linearly) during the year, the investment portfolio would have yielded a return of 12%. Even if the government paid this gain back to its subjects, it makes no sense to say that “the economy” grew at 12%.

To summarize: If, and to the extent that, producers are not at liberty to make money by producing what consumers demand on free markets (what is called consumer sovereignty), the configuration of the number of units of goods and services produced and their prices (GDP is the name of this configuration) is basically meaningless; or, if you will, it represents what the rulers want to be produced at prices that represent the trade-offs they make.

In economic jargon, a government-dictated increase in GDP does not signal a Pareto improvement, that is, an increase in the welfare of some individuals without a decrease in the welfare of anybody else. Most economists, however, would view as Pareto improvements the production or financing of “public goods” wanted by everybody but not excludable to non-payers (such as territorial defense), as well as the reduction of “externalities.”

Thus, if a ruler’s dirigiste policies result in the production of, say, more steel and less wheat, an increase in GDP does not imply that the economy has grown in the sense of increasing the value of consumption as evaluated by the consumers themselves. It is only in the longer run and mainly negatively that the evolution of GDP (per capita) can lead to some conclusion: if it plunges or stagnates (as it did in Argentina for long periods), we may, especially if other indicators confirm the trend, consider that as a refutation of the ruler’s beneficial contribution to economic efficiency.

*****************************************

Featured image: Busts of Juan and Evita Peron covered with snow.



Source link

Tags: figuresGDPReveal
ShareTweetShareShare
Previous Post

MiB: Tom Hancock, GMO Focused Equity

Next Post

I Want to Give My Daughter and Her Husband $50,000 For a Down Payment. Do I Have to Worry About the Gift Tax?

Related Posts

Christine Lagarde mentioned leaving ECB early to go WEF, says Klaus Schwab

Christine Lagarde mentioned leaving ECB early to go WEF, says Klaus Schwab

by Index Investing News
May 28, 2025
0

Unlock the Editor’s Digest free of chargeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.Christine...

Donald Trump warns Vladimir Putin he’s ‘taking part in with fireplace’

Donald Trump warns Vladimir Putin he’s ‘taking part in with fireplace’

by Index Investing News
May 27, 2025
0

This text is an on-site model of our FirstFT publication. Subscribers can signal as much as our Asia, Europe/Africa or...

Politicians in Black Robes – Econlib

Politicians in Black Robes – Econlib

by Index Investing News
May 28, 2025
0

Rule of regulation has lengthy been sacred to the classical liberal.  Whereas the time period was popularized by British jurist...

Enjoyable with Dangerous Investing Concepts

Enjoyable with Dangerous Investing Concepts

by Index Investing News
May 27, 2025
0

Click on for video.Supply: Paul Krugman     I'm within the 4th quarter of the HNTI promo tour, and we...

Transcript: Ron Shaich, Au Bon Ache, Panera Bread & CAVA

Transcript: Ron Shaich, Au Bon Ache, Panera Bread & CAVA

by Index Investing News
May 28, 2025
0

    The transcript from this week’s MiB: Ron Shaich, Au Bon Ache, Panera Bread & CAVA, is under. You'll...

Next Post
I Want to Give My Daughter and Her Husband ,000 For a Down Payment. Do I Have to Worry About the Gift Tax?

I Want to Give My Daughter and Her Husband $50,000 For a Down Payment. Do I Have to Worry About the Gift Tax?

How a law has turned the tables on interfaith couples

How a law has turned the tables on interfaith couples

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED

Russian warplane crashes into building in Siberia

Russian warplane crashes into building in Siberia

October 23, 2022
Haiti’s future ‘vibrant’ regardless of terrifying escalation of violence — International Points

Haiti’s future ‘vibrant’ regardless of terrifying escalation of violence — International Points

December 28, 2024
Worldwide Recreation Expertise: Respectable Fundamentals Amid Divestiture Dangers And Uncertainty

Worldwide Recreation Expertise: Respectable Fundamentals Amid Divestiture Dangers And Uncertainty

October 11, 2024
Usefulness of a Non-Lying Strategy: Two Examples

Usefulness of a Non-Lying Strategy: Two Examples

March 13, 2023
Shares making greatest after hour strikes: Novavax, Allbirds and extra

Shares making greatest after hour strikes: Novavax, Allbirds and extra

August 10, 2022
Factbox-Aviation emissions targets in focus at Paris Airshow By Reuters

Factbox-Aviation emissions targets in focus at Paris Airshow By Reuters

June 21, 2023
BNB Worth Eyes 0 Milestone: Will Bulls Break The Barrier?

BNB Worth Eyes $600 Milestone: Will Bulls Break The Barrier?

July 17, 2024
How Do Active Managers Invest Their Own Money?

How Do Active Managers Invest Their Own Money?

January 25, 2023
Index Investing News

Get the latest news and follow the coverage of Investing, World News, Stocks, Market Analysis, Business & Financial News, and more from the top trusted sources.

  • 1717575246.7
  • Browse the latest news about investing and more
  • Contact us
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • xtw18387b488

Copyright © 2022 - Index Investing News.
Index Investing News is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • Investing
  • Financial
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Property
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion

Copyright © 2022 - Index Investing News.
Index Investing News is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In