Trump exhibits his true colours when confronted together with his historical past of racism

Charles Rex Arbogast / Related Press

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump walks on stage on the Nationwide Affiliation of Black Journalists, NABJ, conference, Wednesday, July 31, 2024, in Chicago.

Sunday, Aug. 4, 2024 | 2 a.m.

Final week, the Nationwide Affiliation of Black Journalists reminded the nation of what journalists ought to be doing when confronted with outrageous statements by Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, or every other politician for that matter: They requested him about these statements instantly and with out couching. It was a refreshing scene in these diminished occasions when journalists too usually maintain again in interviews as a result of they fear about entry and know that politicians can hunt down pleasant venues.

Trump has an extended historical past of insulting and degrading individuals of shade that dates to the Seventies, when the Justice Division introduced a federal lawsuit towards Trump, his father and his firm for alleged racial discrimination at housing developments in New York.

In 1989, he ran a full-page advert in all 4 of New York Metropolis’s main newspapers calling for the execution of six nonwhite youngsters who had been accused of raping a girl in Central Park in Manhattan. All six youngsters had been ultimately exonerated.

Since then, Trump has continued to utter racist remarks that embrace all the pieces from the “birtherism” insults throughout Barack Obama’s presidency to questioning the patriotism and authorized standing of Black and brown elected officers to courting white supremacist voters. In accordance with Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, he additionally denigrated Black individuals as “too silly” to vote for him.

Final week he was in entrance of a room crammed with a few of the most achieved Black journalists within the nation, journalists who’re virtually all intimately conscious of Trump’s racist previous.

ABC Information senior congressional correspondent Rachel Scott, one of many three journalists conducting the panel-style interview, determined to deal with the elephant within the room head on:

“You have got pushed false claims about a few of your rivals, from Nikki Haley to former President Barack Obama, saying that they weren’t born in the US, which isn’t true,” the query started. “You have got advised 4 congressmen, ladies of shade, who had been Americans, to return to the place they got here from. You have got used phrases like ‘animal’ to explain Black district attorneys. You’ve attacked Black journalists, calling them ‘losers,’ saying the questions that they ask are ‘silly and racist.’ You’ve had dinner with a white supremacist at your Mar-a-Lago resort,” Scott continued.

“So, my query, sir, now that you’re asking Black supporters to vote for you: Why ought to Black voters belief you after you have got used language like that?” Scott requested.

Trump’s response was to change into defensive and assault Scott, calling her “very impolite” and “nasty,” describing the query as “horrible” and ABC Information as a “faux information group.”

To be clear, quoting political candidates and asking them in the event that they stand by their prior phrases or how voters ought to interpret their phrases isn’t impolite or nasty, it’s an indication {of professional} journalism. It indicators {that a} journalist has taken the time to do their homework prematurely and discovered concerning the statements or positions of a candidate which will give pause to some voters. A lot of these questions are additionally alternatives for candidates to make clear their place, treatment previous errors, display studying and development, and in any other case replace the details on document.

Trump did not take the chance. He may have said unequivocally that Haley and Obama are U.S. residents, affirmed that Black Individuals ought to by no means be made to really feel unwelcome in the US because of their race or praised the contributions of Black Individuals to society. As a substitute, predictably, Trump spewed ignorant and vile rhetoric. He hurled insults on the wonderful reporter sitting throughout from him for doing nothing greater than asking an inexpensive and knowledgeable query that was related to the viewers.

Because the interview continued, Trump would proceed to insult the assembled journalists and Black Individuals usually, claiming that Vice President Kamala Harris, the probably Democratic presidential nominee, was not actually a Black lady, however slightly “occurred to show Black” simply “a couple of years in the past.”

When requested what ought to have been a simple query about whether or not he helps the precept of “one particular person, one vote,” Trump tried to pit Black individuals towards immigrants, happening a rambling monologue about harmful immigrants coming to the US to steal “Black jobs,” and providing a imprecise description of what he meant by the time period.

And in what can solely be described as a merciless irony, Trump doubled down on his promise to pardon the convicted criminals who brutally assaulted greater than 100 law enforcement officials throughout the Jan. 6, 2021, rebellion — an assault that led to the dying of at the very least 5 officers.

In contrast to the Black youngsters he went after together with his full-page advert in 1989, the individuals convicted of the Jan. 6 rebellion really dedicated the crime they had been accused of. Many had been recognized as a result of they proudly bragged about it to associates, co-workers and on social media. But as an alternative of upholding the rule of legislation, Trump promised to guard and pardon them. After all that shouldn’t shock us; in spite of everything, they had been doing his bidding.

In brief, the honest but hard-hitting questions from the journalists interviewing Trump, mixed together with his obvious incapability to even try to cover his overtly violent, hateful and racist beliefs, allowed the American public to get a crystal-clear picture of the Republican candidate. What we noticed ought to be disturbing to all Individuals.

In contrast to previous statements, Trump can’t declare he was taken out of context. The interview was broadcast reside, unedited and uninterrupted. The previous president was given each alternative to make clear his previous statements and make new statements that welcomed a wide selection of numerous followers. As a substitute, he selected divisiveness over unity, racism over inclusion, and lawlessness over justice.

The spectacular Black ladies who interviewed Trump on the NABJ fulfilled their obligation as journalists by serving to the general public see who and what Donald Trump is. Now it’s our flip to satisfy our obligation as Americans and voters, by preserving Trump and all different candidates who spew his model of violent and racist vitriol out of public workplace.