A current article in The Economist mentioned what they assume is the president-elect’s view of rates of interest:
A extra hawkish Fed could, in flip, invite the wrath of Mr Trump, who has insisted that, as president, he ought to have a say over rates of interest. He will certainly need to see steeper price cuts now that he’s in cost.
This jogs my memory of a narrative entitled The Monkey’s Paw, the place the protagonist is granted three needs, which don’t prove in addition to meant. Let’s contemplate some doable outcomes, after which consider the kind of rate of interest path that Donald Trump ought to desire.
1. In most events, steep rate of interest cuts are related to recessions. Current examples occurred in 2020, 2008, and 2001. Recessions are unpopular.
2. One may argue that The Economist meant that Trump prefers a steep decline in rates of interest mixed with a powerful financial system. And the financial system at the moment does seem fairly sturdy, with the Atlanta Fed forecasting 3.3% progress in This fall. However there’s a substantial danger {that a} steep minimize underneath that situation might set off excessive inflation. In the intervening time, the fed funds futures market is predicting some price cuts over the subsequent few months, however at a much less steep price of decline than we’ve seen in current months. On the similar time, market inflation expectations are barely above goal. If the Fed had been to undertake even “steeper price cuts” than seen within the current previous, regardless of the strong NGDP progress, there can be a really actual danger of inflation re-accelerating. Inflation is unpopular.
3. Maybe the Fed price goal continues to be far above equilibrium. (However then why is progress so sturdy?) Maybe it is going to be doable to chop charges and maintain the enlargement going, as we noticed in 2019 and 1998. However we’ve already seen a 75-basis level minimize. It could be nearly unprecedented to see a fair steeper minimize from this level ahead, with out both re-igniting inflation or being a response to recession.
To be clear, I’m not saying that we’re more likely to get a recession or excessive inflation. However that’s as a result of I don’t count on to see even steeper price cuts. I count on the tempo of price cuts will really gradual in 2025. And I imagine this might be the absolute best outcome. Certainly I’ll go even additional. If these three situations had been totally defined to Trump, I doubt he’d be rooting for “steeper price cuts”, particularly if he had just lately learn The Monkey’s Paw.
Or Goldilocks and the Three Bears.
That is an illustration from The Monkey’s Paw: