Commerce tariffs are again — reshaping markets and elevating crucial questions for traders. In early 2025, america enacted broad-based tariffs on practically all buying and selling companions, reversing many years of liberalization. The end result: renewed volatility, geopolitical rigidity, and a transparent crucial for portfolio resilience. Whereas at present’s headlines really feel new, the dynamics aren’t.
Over the previous 150 years, america has seen a number of high-tariff regimes — from the submit–Civil Struggle growth to the Smoot-Hawley fallout. The worldwide economic system has modified, however investor habits and threat pricing stay ruled by acquainted patterns.
On this weblog, we study these classes by a data-driven lens, leveraging our proprietary database of 150 years of asset and financial knowledge—probably the most complete long-term dataset on tariffs, financial progress, and funding returns accessible so far ([3], [4], [5]). Our goal is to not counsel that historical past will repeat itself, however to uncover patterns that rhyme — offering context for traders searching for to navigate at present’s uncertainty. The proof reveals that whereas tariffs can introduce stress into markets, systematic fairness elements, notably low-volatility, have traditionally offered stability and added worth during times of commerce disruption. For traders going through a resurgence in protectionist coverage, these classes are each well timed and actionable.
The Historical past of Tariffs
Reveals 1 and a pair of hint america by a number of tariff regimes since 1875. From protectionism to liberalization and again once more, tariff coverage has mirrored broader political and financial forces. This long-run view provides vital context for at present’s shifts.
Exhibit 1: US Efficient Tariff Fee Since 1875
Yale BudgetLab and Northern Belief Asset Administration – Quantitative Methods. The efficient US tariff charge is measured as customs obligation income as a p.c of products imports. The pattern interval is 1875-2024.
Exhibit 2: Historic Tariff Traits
Yale BudgetLab and Northern Belief Asset Administration – Quantitative Methods.
1875-1913: Protectionist Peak
Within the Civil Struggle america applied the Morrill Tariff in 1861, elevating common tariff charges on dutiable commodities to roughly 47% to generate income for the Civil Struggle. From the post-Civil Struggle period (which was 1861–1865) to World Struggle I, tariffs remained excessive to guard flourishing industries. Tariffs on dutiable imports averaged between 30% and 50%, reflecting the Republican Get together’s dedication to industrial growth by commerce boundaries, amounting to efficient tariffs of round 30%. Notable laws consists of the Morrill Tariff (1861), the McKinley Tariff (1890), and the Dingley Tariff (1897), the latter of which marked the peak of protectionism on this period.
1913–Twenties: First Liberalization
The Underwood Tariff Act of 1913, enacted beneath President Woodrow Wilson, marked a turning level by decreasing the fundamental tariff charges. As well as, many uncooked supplies and groceries had been added to the freed from tariff record. This shift was pushed by Democratic efforts to advertise freer commerce and encourage American producers to supply extra environment friendly and grow to be extra aggressive with their costs, decreasing the typical value for customers.
Nineteen Thirties: Smoot-Hawley Period
The 1929 inventory market crash triggered a world downturn, prompting international locations to guard home industries. In 1930, america handed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, elevating duties on over 20,000 imports—pushing common tariff charges to 45%. As a substitute of stabilizing the economic system, the coverage sparked world retaliation, with main buying and selling companions like Canada, the UK, and Germany imposing countermeasures. The end result: a commerce conflict and a 60% drop in world commerce by 1933.
Publish-WWII to Seventies: Commerce Liberalization Period
After World Struggle II, U.S. coverage pivoted towards multilateral liberalization by the Normal Settlement on Tariffs and Commerce (GATT). By means of negotiation rounds, leading to over 100 agreements, together with Geneva, Dillon, Kennedy, and Tokyo, common tariffs on industrial items fell dramatically. By the Seventies, US tariffs had been round 10% or decrease, reflecting a world pattern towards freer commerce.
1990S–2000s: NAFTA and WTO Integration
With the signing of NAFTA (1992) coming into power (1994) and the U.S. becoming a member of the WTO (1995), tariff boundaries declined even additional. By the 2010s, common tariffs on all US imports had dropped to roughly 1.5–2.5%, reflecting the height of US commerce openness.
2018–2020s: Strategic Protectionism
Starting in 2018, the Trump administration imposed a ten% blanket tariff on imports, together with extra levies concentrating on international locations with giant commerce surpluses with america, notably China. These measures marked a shift towards selective protectionism and initiated retaliatory tariffs by main buying and selling companions.
2025: Escalation of Broad Tariff Coverage
In 2025, america enacted its most vital commerce shift in a century: a ten% blanket tariff on all imports, plus an added levy primarily based on every nation’s bilateral items deficit. Although a 90-day grace interval softened the rollout, ongoing exemptions and reversals have created persistent coverage uncertainty. The impression has been most acute for China, the first goal, with retaliatory tariffs from Beijing following rapidly. The risky and politically charged setting has difficult forecasting and elevated warning amongst world traders.
The menace now hanging over the worldwide economic system is that President Trump is orchestrating a return to the Nineteen Thirties, when the notorious Smoot-Hawley tariffs set off a series response of worldwide retaliation, usually blamed for deepening the Melancholy. This transfer contrasts sharply with the multilateral liberalization pattern of the earlier many years. These regimes of US commerce tariffs additionally impression common world tariffs the world over, as different international locations both had excessive tariffs (like European international locations within the 19th century) or retaliated (for instance in the course of the Smoot-Hawley period). The determine under, taken from Bas, 2012 reveals the typical stage of worldwide tariffs [2].
Exhibit 3: Unweighted World Common Personal Tariff, 35 International locations, %
Bas, M. (2012). Enter-trade liberalization and agency export choices: Proof from Argentina. Journal of Growth Economics, 97(2), 81-493.
Tariffs are broadly considered impediments to commerce openness. By rising the price of cross-border transactions, excessive tariffs have a tendency to limit the movement of products and companies, thereby decreasing a rustic’s trade-to-GDP ratio—a regular measure of openness [2]. Exhibit 3 illustrates the historic evolution of US commerce openness, outlined because the sum of imports and exports as a proportion of GDP, with key tariff regimes highlighted.
Exhibit 4: Historic Commerce Openness
GlobalMacroDatabase, Yale BudgetLab, Northern Belief Asset Administration – Quantitative Methods. The determine reveals the historic timeseries habits of the 10-year centered transferring common of U.S. Commerce Openness (primarily based on the sum of US Imports and Exports as a proportion of GDP). The bars highlighted durations of excessive tariffs. Tariff charges are calculated as the whole income from import duties divided by the worth of complete imports in the identical 12 months. The pattern interval is 1875-2024.
The info reveals clear declines in openness during times of elevated protectionism, notably the late nineteenth century and the Smoot-Hawley period of the Nineteen Thirties. Conversely, commerce openness expanded considerably in the course of the submit–World Struggle II liberalization section and thru the multilateral agreements of the Nineteen Nineties and 2000s. This pattern started to reverse within the late 2010s, as focused tariffs—notably these imposed on China throughout President Trump’s first time period—curtailed world commerce flows. The latest escalation in 2025 threatens to speed up this reversal, underscoring the persistent rigidity between protectionist insurance policies and world financial integration.
What Does the Knowledge Inform Us About Tariffs and Financial Development?
A primary order query for traders is what’s the impression of tariffs on financial progress? Whereas intuitive arguments usually hyperlink protectionism with weaker financial outcomes, the historic knowledge current a extra nuanced image. Educational analysis over the previous many years has yielded combined outcomes, with some durations displaying constructive correlations between excessive tariffs and robust progress— particularly earlier than World Struggle II — whereas post-war knowledge level to slower progress in high-tariff regimes.
This phenomenon has been termed the “tariff–progress paradox,” first recognized by Bairoch (1972), who famous that economies within the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries usually grew quickly regardless of, and even alongside, elevated tariff ranges[1]. On the identical time, economical channels counsel tariffs traditionally raised enter prices and have performed little to spice up productiveness, thereby doubtlessly hindering financial progress originating from different historic sources like migration, restoration of the good despair, or productiveness will increase coming from main improvements.
To offer additional coloration on the connection between efficient tariffs and financial progress we plot in Exhibit 5 the annual US actual GDP progress charges since 1875, with the earlier excessive tariff durations highlighted in gray.
Exhibit 5: US Tariffs Vs. Financial Development
GlobalMacroDatabase, Yale BudgetLab and Northern Belief Asset Administration – Quantitative Methods. The efficient US tariff charge is measured as customs obligation income as a proportion of products imports. The bars highlighted durations of excessive tariffs. US financial progress is measured by the ten years (centered) common progress charge in actual GDP.
We are able to see that US financial progress was marginally increased throughout excessive tariff regimes. In the course of the Protectionist Peak’ interval, the economic system skilled a excessive however regularly declining progress charge of three.9% on common, adopted by a major drop in the course of the Nice Melancholy. Subsequently, progress recovered and averaged above 5% in the course of the ‘Smoot-Hawley’ period.
After that, tariffs declined, however financial progress fell to ranges under these seen in the course of the protectionist peak — dropping from 3.2% within the submit–World Struggle II interval to 2.2% because the begin of the twenty first century. Furthermore, proof suggests a prisoner’s dilemma for particular person international locations. If a single nation imposes tariffs in a focused and well-designed method, it might reap some advantages. Nevertheless, if others retaliate, the result usually worsens for all.
Leaders contemplating a shift towards commerce openness face a strategic sport, not an remoted determination. Defection by main economies — elevating tariffs unilaterally — usually leads others to observe go well with. In the long run, solely cooperation serves the perfect pursuits of the “prisoners.” Therefore, the worldwide context and worldwide responses matter considerably, with a basic ‘prisoner’s consequence’ probably if everybody begins retaliating. Good luck, politics.
Does this imply we will count on tariffs to keep away from harming — and even benefitting — financial progress going ahead? We take a purely data-driven historic perspective, however we emphasize that at present’s economies differ in vital methods from these of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Most notably, the worldwide economic system is now way more interconnected, with intricate worldwide provide chains, more and more advanced and tech-driven merchandise, and a US economic system that depends extra closely on the export of companies than items.
If the aim of protectionism is to enhance commerce balances, historical past provides some precedent, however on the identical time, world commerce has grow to be a a lot bigger share of world GDP. This implies that the chance value of retreating behind protectionist partitions could also be significantly higher at present than it was prior to now.
Tariffs and Funding Returns
Subsequent, we flip to the impression of tariffs on funding returns. Our distinctive and intensive historic dataset allows us to look at this query by a purely data-driven lens, specializing in actual returns throughout each asset lessons and fairness elements. We analyze key conventional asset lessons accessible over an extended pattern — equities, bonds, and gold — in addition to basic fairness model elements together with measurement, worth, momentum, low threat, and high quality. These elements signify core constructing blocks in traders’ alternative units. We conduct three important analyses: (i) a pattern break up primarily based on earlier tariff episodes recognized in Exhibit 2; (ii) a pattern break up primarily based on the extent of US efficient tariffs; and (iii) a pattern break up primarily based on commerce openness. Exhibit 6 reveals the outcomes when zooming into the key tariff regimes recognized above.
Exhibit 6: Actual Funding Returns Throughout Tariff Regimes
Baltussen et al. (2023), Yale BudgetLab and Northern Belief Asset Administration – Quantitative Methods. Knowledge from January 1875 till December 2024, * aside from High quality which begins in 1940, High quality is not noted for durations with restricted observations. Returns are inflation-adjusted, in annual phrases, in USD and averaged throughout tariff regimes.
The outcomes present that equities carried out nicely throughout earlier high-tariff durations, with annual actual returns averaging 5.3% in the course of the Protectionist Peak and 5.1% in the course of the Smoot-Hawley period –each broadly consistent with the long-term common over the previous 150 years. Bond returns had been extra modest, at 2.7% and 1.1% respectively, whereas gold posted destructive returns in the course of the 1875–1913 interval. Fairness issue portfolios constantly outperformed the broad market, including roughly 2.0% in each high-tariff regimes.
Notably, low-volatility stood out in the course of the 1875–1913 interval, whereas the dimensions issue delivered notably robust outcomes in the course of the 1930–1945 Smoot-Hawley period.
Subsequent, we think about a pattern break up primarily based explicitly on the extent of US efficient tariffs, utilizing a cutoff of 15%, as proven in Exhibit 7. The outcomes align carefully with the interval classifications offered in Exhibit 6. Actual fairness returns are, on common, constructive and broadly consistent with long-term averages. Actual bond returns are additionally constructive throughout high-tariff episodes however are typically nearer to zero when tariffs are comparatively low.
In distinction, gold returns are usually flat throughout high-tariff durations however extra constructive when tariffs are decrease. Fairness elements, nevertheless, present a constant value-add over the market portfolio, delivering robust returns in each excessive and low tariff environments. Low-volatility methods carried out nicely throughout high-tariff episodes, whereas measurement, worth, and different elements additionally held up robustly.
Exhibit 7: Funding Returns Throughout Tariff Regimes
Baltussen et al. (2023), Yale BudgetLab and Northern Belief Asset Administration – Quantitative Methods. The efficient US tariff charge is measured as customs obligation income as a p.c of products imports. Efficient US tariff charges are year-end values, replicated throughout July-to-June, centered round December. Elements are simulated. Knowledge from January 1875 till December 2024, aside from High quality which begins in 1940, given earlier knowledge is just not accessible for this issue. The Multi-Issue collection consists of all elements accessible at every time limit. The shaded half for high quality represents the market return over the identical interval. Elements are constructed by overlaying long-short portfolios available on the market portfolio. Returns are in annual phrases, in USD. Numbers in parentheses point out the typical variety of years per state of affairs.
These outcomes mirror the assorted channels by which tariffs can affect issue efficiency. Elevated tariffs usually improve enter prices, compress revenue margins, and heighten macroeconomic uncertainty, circumstances beneath which traders are likely to favor extra resilient, lower-risk firms. This helps low-volatility and high quality issue outperformance. On the identical time, tariffs can weigh extra closely on cyclical and globally built-in corporations, which are sometimes concentrated in worth and small-cap segments. Nevertheless, when these elements are priced at deep reductions, they’ll nonetheless ship robust returns, notably if coverage shocks reverse or are already priced in, explaining their resilience even in high-tariff regimes.
We subsequent check how funding returns fluctuate with commerce openness, measured as exports plus imports relative to GDP. This third pattern break up is proven in Exhibit 8.
Exhibit 8: Funding Returns Throughout Altering US Commerce Openness
Baltussen et al. (2023), Yale BudgetLab and Northern Belief Asset Administration – Quantitative Methods. US Commerce Openness ranges are year-end values, replicated throughout July-to-June, centered round December. Elements are simulated. Knowledge from January 1875 till December 2024, aside from High quality which begins in 1940, given earlier knowledge is just not accessible for this issue. The Multi-Issue collection consists of all elements accessible at every time limit. The shaded half for high quality represents the market return over the identical interval. Elements are constructed by overlaying long-short portfolios available on the market portfolio. Returns are in annual phrases, in USD. Numbers in parentheses point out the typical variety of years per state of affairs.
Per the earlier two analyses, fairness returns stay comparatively secure throughout completely different commerce openness regimes. Bond returns have a tendency to carry up nicely when commerce openness declines, whereas gold returns are, on common, destructive in those self same durations. Against this, fairness elements constantly add worth over the market portfolio in each excessive and low openness situations, with low-volatility methods particularly delivering robust efficiency.
Whereas financial outcomes have diversified, fairness markets — and particularly fairness elements — have proven resilience throughout historic tariff regimes. Low-volatility, measurement, and worth methods have constantly added worth, even during times of heightened protectionism. As commerce tensions rise once more, these long-term patterns provide helpful steerage for constructing sturdy, risk-aware portfolios.
REFERENCES
[1] Bairoch, P. (1972). Free commerce and European financial growth within the nineteenth century. European Financial Evaluate, 3(3), 211-245.
[2] Bas, M. (2012). Enter-trade liberalization and agency export choices: Proof from Argentina. Journal of Growth Economics, 97(2), 81-493.
[3] Baltussen, G., Swinkels, L., van Vliet, B., & van Vliet, P. (2023). Investing in Deflation, Inflation, and Stagflation Regimes. Monetary Analysts Journal, 1-28.
[4] Baltussen, G., van Vliet, B., & Van Vliet, P. (2023). The cross-section of inventory returns earlier than CRSP, Working Paper.
[5] Baltussen, G., van Vliet, B., & Vidojevic, M. (2024). Navigating inflation – an evaluation of fairness issue efficiency over 150 years. Northern Belief Company.
