As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face rising complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in belongings (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement belongings, DC plans carry important duty for guaranteeing robust monetary outcomes for contributors1. In 2025, plan sponsors should deal with optimizing funding methods, lowering prices, and enhancing participant schooling to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embrace crucial areas similar to goal date fund choice, charge transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation tendencies.
Concentrating on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Suggestions for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines greatest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embrace:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic overview
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Making the most of all accessible info within the overview and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Creating efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to think about. First, as with every funding course of, it is very important perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by gathering workforce demographics, funding behavioral tendencies — generally present in stories produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s objectives for the plan and general funding beliefs that may function a information when evaluating varied TDFs. Making prudent funding choices requires these components to drive the evaluation and determine TDFs which can be appropriate to your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Lessons
We regularly see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by the hassle of discovering an excellent funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding automobile.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor may choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, slightly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different circumstances, a plan is perhaps eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) automobile with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these selections or oversights lead to plan contributors paying larger funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding automobile.
We advise plan sponsors contemplate the impression on contributors of their present mutual fund share lessons, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for similar CIT technique. We suggest plan sponsors use zero-revenue share lessons of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply larger charge transparency and sometimes decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share lessons.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding critiques observe the same format: a have a look at the financial system and capital markets adopted by a overview of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, modifications are mentioned. Whereas routine critiques of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic overview of the funding lineup construction, which means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re carried out with energetic administration or passive administration. We advise one of these overview no less than each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant means.
Determine 1: Normal Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To guage the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is acceptable or whether or not funding classes ought to be altered. Components for the dialogue may embrace participant group funding data, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Sources
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Research, staff reported spending no less than three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that employees’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
We have now seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages may also help staff enhance their monetary well being and cut back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a major function — significantly for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants just isn’t at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff on the lookout for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These non-public conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Inspecting Committee Construction and Duties
Employment tendencies from “the nice resignation” to “the large keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of at this time’s workforce. These modifications additionally negatively impression an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes may differ from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and tasks
- Construct an onboarding schooling guidelines for brand spanking new committee members
- Keep a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with schooling
- Verify the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, govt summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Tendencies in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there’s the potential for brand spanking new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement packages can include tax laws, so it is going to be essential for plan sponsors to remain present on potential modifications.
From a litigation standpoint, two main tendencies formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture belongings.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to watch plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the companies supplied? You will need to be aware that this matter covers each vendor bills, similar to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, similar to alternative of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation concerning utilization of forfeiture belongings is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture belongings to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different tendencies in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal function in shaping the monetary way forward for thousands and thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, value effectivity, governance, and participant schooling, they’ll improve retirement outcomes and cut back fiduciary dangers. As market circumstances, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making will probably be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant impression in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric introduced herein is of a normal nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any individual, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The knowledge contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info just isn’t assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The knowledge contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to alter with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated companies supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions carried out by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax companies settlement. PNC Financial institution just isn’t registered as a municipal advisor below the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
