A brand new ballot exhibits a detailed contest on this month’s upcoming particular election deciding whether or not and methods to fund the creation of publicly owned housing in Seattle.
The ballot additionally exhibits most of Seattle’s public officers are underwater in the case of voters’ notion of their job efficiency and favorability; three out of 4 of these up for reelection this fall, together with Mayor Bruce Harrell, are considered unfavorably by extra voters than view them favorably.
The survey was commissioned by the Northwest Progressive Institute, a left-wing suppose tank that has a monitor document of publishing impartial polling. Funded by Carrie Barnes, a strategist and energetic member of native Democratic organizations, the ballot is the Northwest Progressive Institute’s largest ever of Seattle voters. The aim, stated Andrew Villeneuve, is to take the “heartbeat” of voters within the metropolis and set up a baseline for future polling.
“We now have lengthy felt that it will be invaluable to have a seasonal ballot,” he stated.
The survey of almost 700 seemingly Seattle voters included 35 questions on native points and officers. The margin of error is plus or minus 4.3 proportion factors.
Seattle will conclude a particular election on Feb. 11 to find out whether or not and the way a brand new public developer of housing must be funded. Voters created the Seattle Social Housing Developer in 2023. However as a consequence of authorized limitations on the variety of topics that may be included in voter initiatives, that measure didn’t state how or if the group ought to obtain public {dollars} for its mission.
Tuesday’s election consists of two questions: Ought to the developer be funded? If sure, ought to that come by way of new taxes on firms that pay excessive salaries or by the use of an present tax on massive firms within the metropolis?
The outcomes present voters leaning in favor of funding the developer however break up on how. Practically half of respondents stated they favored giving the developer a bigger finances, and 32% stated they opposed it. In the meantime, 33% stated they supported a brand new tax whereas 31% stated town ought to use present funds.
Villeneuve stated the underlying numbers recommend help for utilizing present funds could also be gaining momentum; it leads amongst those that have already voted and those that are undecided appear to favor it when pressed.
Native firms, together with Amazon, Microsoft and T-Cellular, have all spent closely in opposition to the brand new tax and in help of town utilizing its present income.
The survey additionally gauged how voters really feel about their elected officers, asking them to say how favorably they considered these up for reelection this yr along with score the job efficiency of all elected officers in metropolis authorities. The 2 questions, whereas related, supply barely completely different views.
Practically all elected members of Seattle’s authorities are underwater in each classes. Giant swaths of town’s voters are uncertain about how their representatives are doing, which Villeneuve acknowledged limits the conclusions that may be drawn.
4 individuals in metropolis authorities are up for reelection later this yr: Mayor Bruce Harrell, Metropolis Lawyer Ann Davison and Councilmembers Sara Nelson and Alexis Mercedes Rinck.
Harrell is considered favorably by 36% of voters and unfavorably by 50%. His job approval numbers are barely higher, at 38% approve and 48% disapprove.
Davison is considered favorably by 31% of voters and unfavorably additionally by 31%. Her job approval was 29% authorized and 32% disapproved.
Nelson had the weakest score: 24% considered her favorably in comparison with 44% unfavorably. Her job approval numbers have been 22% optimistic and 33% detrimental.
Mercedes Rinck was the one individual to be considered extra favorably than not — 30% favorable versus 25% unfavorable — although she additionally had by far the biggest quantity say they weren’t positive.
She has additionally solely been within the job for a few months.
Six members of the Metropolis Council will not be up for election this yr. The survey discovered all of them to have a detrimental job approval score, with Councilmember Pleasure Hollingsworth doing the perfect and Councilmembers Maritza Rivera, Rob Saka and Bob Kettle doing the worst, though most voters stated they have been uncertain.
Half of those that answered stated they’re proud of their high quality of life in Seattle and 40% stated they’re dissatisfied.
The priorities for Seattle voters stay constant: Practically three-fourths stated public security and two-thirds stated connecting homeless individuals to providers to carry them inside.
Practically 60% stated defending weak populations from the Trump administration was necessary to them. About half named supporting small companies, bringing accountability to the Seattle Police Division and taxing the rich to fund public providers as priorities as nicely.
Gov. Bob Ferguson is essentially common whereas President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance are unpopular.
