Again in my early twenties, I used to be at a celebration at a rooftop bar trapped in a spherical of small speak with a buddy of a buddy. Scrambling round for dialog, I requested her the place she got here from. “Folkestone,” she stated. In case you don’t know, that’s a coastal city in Kent, within the south east of England.
With out hesitation, I replied: “Folkestone Invicta” — the identify of the city’s native non-League membership, at the moment taking part in within the seventh tier of English soccer. To at the present time, I’ve by no means forgotten the look on her face: one in every of nearly whole boredom and indifference, however for a hint quantity of pity.
But, to paraphrase a sure Premier League membership’s ‘Model Playbook’: in a world filled with Uniteds, Citys and Rovers, there is just one Invicta — Folkestone Invicta.
And again in 1936, if the membership’s founders had thought ‘Invicta’ was distinctive sufficient to be the membership’s identify by itself — no want for the ‘Folkestone’ half — then not solely might I’ve averted that second’s awkwardness a long time later, however these founders would have been nearly a century forward of their time.
As The Athletic revealed on Friday, Tottenham not need you to name them Tottenham. It’s ‘Spurs’ for brief, thanks. And that’s not the one little bit of most well-liked nomenclature.
“When referring to the crew or the model, please use ‘Tottenham Hotspur’, ‘Tottenham Hotspur Soccer Membership’ or ‘THFC’,” the membership wrote in steerage despatched to Premier League broadcasters this month. “By no means consult with our Membership as ‘Tottenham’, ‘Tottenham Hotspur FC’ or ‘TH’.” By no means. Or else.
It raises many questions, not least, what’s the materials distinction between the phrases ‘Tottenham Hotspur Soccer Membership’ and ‘Tottenham Hotspur FC’? I don’t know. However I’m going to make use of the prohibited variations for the remainder of this column within the hope of frightening anyone at Tottenham Hotspur FC into telling me.
There’s a cause for the ‘Spurs’ desire, a minimum of. Tottenham argue Tottenham is the identify of the realm, not the identify of the membership, and this has been their coverage for years. Trawl by means of search engine outcomes and also you’ll do effectively to discover a single use of ‘Tottenham’ with out ‘Hotspur’ hooked up to it on the membership’s web site.

The Tottenham Hotspur Stadium (James Gill – Danehouse/Getty Photographs)
Tottenham have persistently been known as ‘Spurs’ in fixture listings on the Premier League’s official web site for a while. Return by means of the league’s official social media feeds and virtually the one mentions of the phrase ‘Tottenham’ are references to the ‘Tottenham Hotspur Stadium’.
In a means, the membership is merely going again to its roots. When a gaggle of schoolboy cricketers based the membership in 1882, their alternative of identify was ‘Hotspur FC’. The ‘Tottenham’ was solely added two years later as a result of, because the presumably apocryphal story goes, they started receiving the put up of one other membership referred to as Hotspur.
It’s not as if the membership has truly modified its identify and eradicated any geographical marker altogether, both. One other in north London set the precedent for that again in 1913 upon relocation from Woolwich. So, does any of that make this diktat extra explainable?
In response to Friday’s information, some Tottenham followers have rightly stated that with Ange Postecoglou’s facet within the backside half of the desk, after being knocked out of each home cups within the area of three days this month, they and the membership itself have greater issues to fret about.
Others have recommended it’s merely associated to copyright, because the time period ‘Spurs’ can be simpler to trademark than the identify of the encompassing space. Besides Tottenham already checklist the phrase ‘Tottenham’ amongst their registered emblems.
And even when they didn’t, what would that need to do with how the membership is referred to on Soccer Saturday’s vidiprinter?
However it’s arduous to not agree with one other strand of the response, from the Tottenham followers and supporters of different golf equipment who see this as a disappointing signal of the place soccer is at the moment at; one other small brick paved in a highway that the game as a complete has already travelled a great distance down.

However are Tottenham Hotspur followers allowed in? (Jacques Feeney/MI Information/NurPhoto by way of Getty Photographs)
Many Manchester United supporters nonetheless lament the removing of the phrases ‘Soccer Membership’ from the crest in 1998 — controversial on the time, however the identical phrases or the initials ‘F.C.’ are actually recurrently allotted with little remark.
Six years in the past, Liverpool didn’t trademark town’s identify for merchandising functions. Chelsea had extra success of a kind earlier this season, celebrating their a hundred and twentieth anniversary with a brand new, different membership crest that includes their lion rampant regardant above the letters ‘LDN’.
Equally, in 2016, West Ham United added the phrase ‘London’ to their revamped crest, though a minimum of put that to a vote amongst supporters first.
And this form of factor is way from a Premier League phenomenon. Paris Saint-Germain’s rebranding accentuated the phrase ‘Paris’ on their brand, not a lot the ‘Saint-Germain’, and UEFA uniformly refers back to the membership as ‘Paris’ moderately than ‘PSG’.
On the floor degree, Tottenham’s ‘Spurs’ desire is completely different from a few of these examples. Quite than extra intently associating themselves with a bigger metropolitan surrounding, they’ve gone the opposite means: drawing a line between ‘Spurs’ the crew and ‘Tottenham’ the realm in its justifications.
However there’s a frequent thread between such choices. All are basic makes an attempt to make a membership’s id one thing that may be extra simply swallowed and digested. In different phrases, one thing that may be consumed, particularly on the worldwide market.
Too typically, that comes on the expense of what a membership is: its historical past, its tradition, its locality. It’s stated typically sufficient to be a cliche these days, however it’s nonetheless ignored sufficient to bear repeating: soccer golf equipment are representations of their communities before everything, world manufacturers second.
The overwhelming majority of golf equipment recognise that within the creditable work they do inside these communities, however are fast to overlook that duty of their advertising departments when it’s time to take into consideration what is going to promote higher on a plastic water bottle.
Tottenham are on no account alone in that. It typically appears like golf equipment who wish to get forward in soccer’s current panorama need to prioritise the place they’re going over the place they’ve come from. Referring to the membership as ‘Spurs’ moderately than ‘Tottenham’ is a small however not insignificant shift. And sufficient to remind me that, one in every of nowadays, I may need to get myself all the way down to Folkestone Invicta.
(High photograph: Jacques Feeney/MI Information/NurPhoto by way of Getty Photographs)