Most media might play together with Kamala Harris’ blatant border lies, however not everyone seems to be so prepared to cowl for her.
On Tuesday, Tulare County, Calif., Sheriff Mike Boudreaux blasted Harris for utilizing his likeness, with out his permission, in an advert claiming she “spent a long time preventing violent crime as a border-state prosecutor.”
The 2013 picture reveals Boudreaux standing behind Harris at a press convention on a go to to Central Valley as California’s lawyer basic: Per the sheriff, she swooped in simply lengthy sufficient for a photograph op and to take credit score for native legislation enforcement officers’ work cracking down on cartel gang violence.
“The reality is, Harris by no means cared in regards to the cartels and did nothing to cease folks from illegally crossing the border,” Boudreaux fumes.
Doesn’t get far more damning than that.
Harris’ scene-stealing was insulting sufficient again then, however it’s even worse to slap the picture right into a marketing campaign advert a decade later as she tries to pretend a “robust on the border” file.
The advert is a part of a long-running Biden-Harris smoke-and-mirrors marketing campaign.
For years, the message was: The border disaster isn’t truly taking place.
Then it grew to become: Whether it is taking place, she had nothing to do with it.
Now it’s: If she did have one thing to do with it, she truly helped.
‘Spherical and ’spherical we go on Kamala’s spin-o-rama.
It’s all baloney of the worst order, as Boudreaux factors out: “Kamala’s unhappy try to color herself as robust on the border by implying my help — and the help of neighboring legislation enforcement leaders — is pathetic.”
The reality: Harris supported the entire Biden administration’s open-border insurance policies and stood by as “border czar” as hundreds of thousands of unlawful immigrants, together with gang members and terrorists, jumped the border and streamed into American cities.
However because the border is a prime concern for voters, she’s revising historical past — simply as she’s attempting to muddy the waters on her progressive positions on fracking, Medicare for All, defunding the police and a bunch of different unpopular lefty positions that simply gained’t promote.
You nearly can’t blame her for attempting; the media have been useful henchmen in constructing her Potemkin-village marketing campaign, dutifully parroting each new line (and lie) with completely credulity — and even “correcting” their very own previous reporting to match.
She’s not used to being fact-checked.
Sorry, Kam: It appears just like the spin stops right here.
