Each interview Kamala Harris does reminds us why she does so few.
Even with a sympathetic questioner in CBS’s Invoice Whitaker and loads of enhancing, her prerecorded “60 Minutes” sit-down that aired Monday didn’t go properly.
Harris gave us a glimpse into her thoughts, and there’s not a lot there.
Be glad about small favors: At the least she didn’t deflect something with “I grew up a middle-class child.”
However her canned evasions nonetheless aren’t really solutions to the massive questions of this election: what she actually believes, how she’d provide “change” from Joe Biden, what she plans to do, or why anybody ought to anticipate any of her insurance policies to work.
No gotchas
Whitaker challenged Harris on a number of factors, however this shouldn’t have been a tough interview.
There have been no “gotcha” questions.
There have been no surprises.
Practically each subject he broached was one thing Harris had been requested earlier than, in her debate with former President Donald Trump and in her few prior interviews.
Harris wasn’t requested to defend her administration’s lackluster efficiency within the response to Hurricane Helene, or its execution of something apart from opening the border to unlawful migrants.
Airing because it did on Oct. 7, the interview opened with questions in regards to the struggle in Gaza.
Harris caught to the administration’s typical weaselly formulation, saying that Israel had a proper to defend itself — however instantly pivoting to declare that too many Palestinians have died and “this struggle has to finish.”
As long as she received’t say that Israel can and may disable Hamas and Hezbollah to forestall additional assaults on Israel, that’s not an actual proper to self-defense, however a recipe for a endless struggle wherein extra Israelis and extra Palestinians will die.
A lot for “By no means once more.”
No matter else she could have stated in regards to the subject was minimize off from a broadcast that was replete with edits.
Whitaker talked up the financial system, however even along with his encouragement, Harris may solely say she had “a plan” to convey down costs.
However she nonetheless can’t clarify what that plan is, regardless of having had a number of alternatives to take action, together with on the controversy stage.
We do comprehend it includes the federal government printing more cash, which is precisely how we obtained on this mess within the first place.
Coming in your pockets
Whitaker requested Harris twice how she would pay for her anticipated trillions in new spending.
She stated the richest taxpayers ought to pay extra, however you possibly can’t elevate that a lot cash solely from them.
And everybody who obtained a tax minimize throughout the Trump years ought to discover that her solely different reply was guilty the previous president’s tax cuts — all of them. Watch your pockets.
Her solutions on the border disaster had been even worse.
Requested why the administration reversed course on Trump’s insurance policies and let so many individuals into the nation, Harris blamed Congress for not passing a invoice in 2024 — ignoring the truth that her personal administration had unilaterally acted with out Congress for 3 years to create the issue.
She merely had no reply as to why the Biden-Harris administration hadn’t taken steps sooner to undo its personal govt insurance policies.
She regarded pained that Whitaker pressed her on the query.
Harris didn’t simply insult the intelligence of voters — she insulted them, interval.
When Whitaker requested how Harris may model Trump’s rhetoric racist when practically half the nation helps him, she scoffed that “most affordable folks” don’t.
So Trump’s voters are both racist or unreasonable?
Received it.
When pressed on her many obvious flip-flops on fracking, immigration and well being care, Harris claimed she had shifted after touring the nation as vp and had found — shockingly! — that America is an enormous, various nation in want of widespread floor.
After all, she nonetheless has no regard for letting thorny points be determined on the state degree, as she would if she actually revered our variations.
The following time Harris works out a compromise would be the first.
The buck by no means stops
What in regards to the gun she claims to personal?
Harris revealed (laughing awkwardly as she did so) that she has a Glock, which she has used at a firing vary(laughing awkwardly as she did so).
That makes it worse, not higher, that she’s been so decided to take different folks’s weapons — and as soon as filed a Supreme Court docket temporary arguing there is no such thing as a particular person proper to personal a handgun.
Harris is operating a marketing campaign of slogans, not concepts or proposals — and definitely not a marketing campaign of information and accomplishments.
On taxes, on immigration and on a lot else, there are questions she will’t reply, and she will’t cover her incapacity to take action.
That doesn’t bode properly for us if she’s our subsequent president.
Harry Truman used to say, “The buck stops right here.” Harris thinks she will at all times simply print extra bucks.
Dan McLaughlin is a senior author at Nationwide Evaluate. Twitter: @BaseballCrank