Jan. 6 Panel Will Flip Over Proof on Faux Electors to the Justice Dept.

WASHINGTON — The Justice Division has requested the Home committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol for proof it has collected concerning the scheme by former President Donald J. Trump and his allies to place ahead false slates of pro-Trump electors in battleground states gained by Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2020.

Consultant Bennie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi and the chairman of the committee, disclosed the request to reporters on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, and an individual conversant in the panel’s work stated discussions with the Justice Division concerning the false elector scheme had been ongoing. These talks recommend that the division is sharpening its give attention to that side of Mr. Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, one with a direct line to the previous president.

Mr. Thompson stated the committee was working with federal prosecutors to permit them to overview the transcripts of interviews the panel has performed with individuals who served as so-called alternate electors for Mr. Trump. Mr. Thompson stated the Justice Division’s investigation into “fraudulent electors” was the one particular subject the company had broached with the committee.

A Justice Division official stated the company maintained its place that it was requesting copies of all transcripts of witness interviews.

For weeks, the Justice Division has been negotiating with the Jan. 6 panel about turning over transcripts of its interviews to federal prosecutors. The company has requested the committee for copies of each transcript of every of its greater than 1,000 interviews, whereas the committee has pushed again, requesting that the division slim its request.

Mr. Thompson’s feedback Wednesday had been the clearest indication but of what the Justice Division is in search of.

“We’re within the strategy of negotiating how that data can be considered,” Mr. Thompson stated, including that he believed Justice Division officers would make an appointment with the committee to overview the transcripts in particular person. “We’re partaking.”

The Justice Division has been investigating the scheme to place ahead faux electors for months and has issued subpoenas to prime Trump attorneys who labored on the plan.

The committee introduced proof that Mr. Trump sought to steer lawmakers in battleground states gained by Mr. Biden to create the slates of alternate electors supporting him, hoping that Vice President Mike Pence would use them to subvert the traditional democratic course of when he oversaw Congress’s official depend of electoral votes on Jan. 6.

The plan seems to have been set in movement simply days after the election, when a pro-Trump lawyer, Cleta Mitchell, despatched an electronic mail suggesting the thought to John Eastman, one other lawyer near Mr. Trump.

By Nov. 18, 2020, one other pro-Trump lawyer, Kenneth Chesebro, had joined the trouble, writing a memo suggesting that the Trump marketing campaign ought to set up its allies in a number of swing states to draft faux slates of electors. Round Thanksgiving, nonetheless others signed on to the plan, together with Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s private lawyer, and Mark Meadows, the White Home chief of employees, in response to a recorded deposition from Cassidy Hutchinson, an aide to Mr. Meadows.

Finally, the Republican Nationwide Committee was introduced in as nicely, Ronna McDaniel, the group’s chairwoman, stated in a recorded deposition performed at a listening to final month.

Ms. McDaniel testified that Mr. Trump had referred to as her and put Mr. Eastman on the telephone “to speak concerning the significance of the R.N.C. serving to the marketing campaign collect these contingent electors.”

All of this was allowed to go ahead, the committee stated, even supposing a number of attorneys for the Trump marketing campaign believed it was unlawful.

The committee has additionally collected proof concerning the scheme from the so-called alternate electors themselves, issuing subpoenas to greater than a dozen of them. A few of those that obtained subpoenas, together with electors from Georgia, have complied and sat for interviews with the panel.

The curiosity within the faux elector scheme got here because the committee has referred one other matter to the Justice Division, relating to Mr. Trump’s potential interference with witnesses.

In latest weeks, the panel realized that two individuals referred to as Ms. Hutchinson in what she characterised as an try to affect her testimony. Then, the committee revealed on Tuesday, Mr. Trump personally referred to as a witness — although he didn’t attain the particular person, who notified their lawyer — prompting the panel to refer the matter to the Justice Division.

“It’s extremely uncommon,” Mr. Thompson advised reporters on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. “That’s why we, kind of, put that within the fingers of the Justice Division.”

Senator Mitt Romney, Republican of Utah, stated some Republicans had tried to dismiss the matter by suggesting that Mr. Trump may need unintentionally dialed the witness.

“But when the previous president was making an attempt to intrude with a witness, that will be, clearly, a really critical allegation,” stated Mr. Romney, who voted final yr to convict Mr. Trump on the impeachment cost of incitement of riot and take away him after the Jan. 6 assault.

The committee’s give attention to potential witness tampering by Mr. Trump seems to be an effort to prod the Justice Division to analyze the previous president for potential crimes. At every of its latest hearings, the panel has introduced proof that its members consider could possibly be used to bolster prison prices towards Mr. Trump. The committee has supplied particulars, together with concerning the faux electors, that could possibly be grounds for prices of conspiracy to defraud the American individuals, falsifying paperwork and obstructing an official continuing of Congress.

Witness tampering could be yet one more avenue for prosecuting the previous president. Mr. Trump has an extended historical past of constructing statements or taking actions that may be learn as efforts to intrude with ongoing investigations concentrating on him.

In April 2018, he referred to as his former private lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, shortly after Mr. Cohen’s house, workplace and resort room had been searched by the F.B.I. and urged him to remain sturdy, an individual with data of the decision stated.

He additionally made statements — in public and on Twitter — that Robert S. Mueller III, the particular counsel investigating a doable conspiracy between the Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign and Russian officers, thought-about doable acts of obstruction of justice. These included posts on Twitter asserting that Mr. Cohen would by no means activate him after Mr. Cohen was clearly beneath investigation.

Mr. Mueller’s crew, citing a Justice Division view that sitting presidents can’t be indicted, in the end didn’t state whether or not it believed Mr. Trump had obstructed justice within the 11 situations it examined, as a substitute laying them out extensively within the 448-page report it issued.

Maggie Haberman, Emily Cochrane and Glenn Thrush contributed reporting.