Buyers depend on valuation metrics to gauge whether or not a inventory is pretty priced. Amongst these, the PEG ratio is well-liked for its capability to regulate a inventory’s valuation primarily based on future earnings expectations. In contrast to the usual P/E ratio, which merely compares worth to present earnings, PEG incorporates progress projections. It’s merely an organization’s P/E ratio divided by its progress fee. Theoretically, this makes it a extra refined device for assessing whether or not a inventory is under- or overvalued.
However does the PEG ratio present significant insights for broad market developments? To seek out out, we analyzed historic PEG knowledge for the S&P 500 (1985 to 2020) and examined its effectiveness as a buying and selling technique. We used Yardeni Analysis’s PE ratio and its estimates of ahead progress charges for a similar interval.
Exhibit 1. Mapping of the PEG ratio over time.
The traditional knowledge is easy:
- PEG < 1.0 → The inventory is undervalued relative to its anticipated progress.
- PEG > 1.0 → The inventory is overvalued relative to its progress.
Many traders contemplate 1.0 to be a key threshold. If a inventory trades at a PEG under 1.0, it’s seen as a possibility. Whether it is above 1.0, warning is suggested. If we use PEG to gage broad market developments, how usually do these “undervalued” alternatives seem, and do they sign sturdy returns?
Utilizing the S&P 500 knowledge from 1985 to 2020 and ahead progress estimates from Yardeni Analysis, right here’s what we discovered:
- PEG < 1.0 is Uncommon:
- All through the Nineteen Eighties, there have been a handful of months when the PEG ratio dipped under 1.0.
- Within the 2000s, this occurred solely thrice.
- Within the 2010s, it occurred simply 5 instances.
- The PEG ratio virtually by no means supplies constant shopping for alternatives at this threshold.
- PEG as Market Timing Instrument:
- We examined a technique the place an investor would purchase the S&P 500 when the PEG ratio was under 1.0 and promote when it moved above 1.
- Whereas this labored nicely in some durations—just like the Nineteen Eighties—it was far much less efficient within the 2000s and past.
- Increasing the brink to 1.25 or 1.5 confirmed equally combined outcomes.
- Volatility is Excessive:
- The returns related to totally different PEG ranges diverse considerably throughout a long time.
- What labored in a single interval usually failed in one other, making it tough to make use of the PEG ratio as a standalone market sign.
Desk 1.
Whereas the PEG ratio stays a useful gizmo for evaluating particular person shares, our evaluation means that making use of it as a market-wide sign is much much less dependable. Traditionally, alternatives to purchase when the PEG ratio falls under 1.0 have been uncommon, and the technique of buying and selling primarily based on PEG thresholds has yielded inconsistent outcomes, notably since 2000.
Whereas valuation metrics are worthwhile in funding decision-making, no single ratio ought to dictate market timing. As an alternative, traders ought to contemplate the PEG ratio as one piece of a broader analytical framework — complementing it with different basic and macroeconomic elements to make well-rounded funding selections.
Should you appreciated this submit, don’t overlook to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the creator. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the creator’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Photographs / Ascent / PKS Media Inc.
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.
