Index Investing News
Saturday, May 24, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • World
  • Investing
  • Financial
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Property
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Home
  • World
  • Investing
  • Financial
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Property
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Index Investing News
No Result
View All Result

Governing and the Rule of Law

by Index Investing News
March 29, 2024
in Economy
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Home Economy
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


It is not because a law has been democratically and duly adopted that it necessarily exemplifies the rule of law. It is not because democratically elected politicians govern that governing is good. One current example is given by the US and EU governments siding against Apple and in favor of its developers (outside suppliers) and competitors, under some antitrust “laws” that pretend to determine what consumers want. Another of the myriad of cases that could be cited is the US government siding with the United Steelworkers against US Steel which wants to strike a bargain with Nippon Steel. (On Apple, among other reports, see “Apple Turns to Longtime Steve Jobs Disciple to Defend Its ‘Walled Garden,’” Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2024.) Not to mention discrimination for or against preferred identity groups.

For Anthony de Jasay, the central problem with the state is that it takes sides among its citizens, favors some and harms others, which he sees as the essence of governing. His ideal and unattainable “capitalist state” would not govern: its raison d’être would be only to ensure that a worse state, intent of governing, does not take over. In other words, the problem is that the state discriminates against some citizens in order to favor others.

This idea is not quite as revolutionary as it appears. Less radical liberals believed in a similar theory. Nobel prizewinner Friedrich Hayek argued that, in the classical liberal tradition, a law must be a general and abstract rule that applies to unknown future cases and cannot target any specific individual or group. (See his Law, Legislation, and Liberty, especially Volume 1 and Volume 2.) James Buchanan, another Nobel economist, also believed that a law cannot discriminate against any individual or group. The rule of law defines what we otherwise describe as a government of laws, not of men.

The rule of law in the liberal sense is more demanding than what most people (including many if not most lawyers) believe. The law is not merely a trick that allows a democratic government to do anything it wants provided it respects certain formalities, such as adoption by the two chambers of Congress and the signature by the president. For example, a “law” decreeing that all citizens will have their left arms equally amputated would be no law in the liberal sense.

To be consistent with the rule of law, a law must also have some substantive content. For Hayek, it needs to be essential for the maintenance of an autoregulated order. For Buchanan, a law must respect constitutional rules that presumptively meet the consent of all and every individual in the society. Contrary to what Vladimir Putin claimed, and despite his laughable efforts to give his state the look and feel of democracy, there cannot be a “dictatorship of the law,” for the two terms are antinomic terms. (On Putin’s “dictatorship of the law,” see Geoffrey Hosking, “Dictatorship of the Law,” Index of Censorship, Vol. 34, No. 4 [2005].)

The objection that the state cannot avoid discriminating is weak. Criminals are often proposed as an example. But a liberal state does not “discriminate” against criminals since laws against murder or other major threats to the ethics of reciprocity (Buchanan) or to the autoregulated social order (Hayek) are known in advance and do not identify by name any specific individual, association, or corporation. Nobody who does not want to be treated as a criminal only has not to commit such crimes. This also implies that a liberal state cannot grant a subsidy that is not available to all.

De Jasay, who was both a liberal and an anarchist, did argue that it is impossible for the state to literally treat everybody equally because equal treatment along one dimension always represents discrimination by another criterion. For example, treating everybody equally for Medicare premiums and benefits means discriminating against men, who statistically survive fewer years than women.

One objection to de Jasay’s thesis is that a state that takes sides may be welcome if, for each individual, the net effect of the multiple interventions is favorable or neutral. Many seem to think that way: “I lose this time at the roulette of politics, but I will win next time. Leviathan hates me today but he will love me tomorrow.” In reality, it is as likely that the total economic cost of state interventions is higher than their total economic benefits for some individuals. The purpose of the social contract posited by Buchanan, with its overarching rules strictly limiting redistributive policies, is to ensure that no group of individuals would be continously exploited. De Jasay replied that such a social contract is impossible. At any rate, he would argue, churning (alternatively giving to and taking from the same individual) to the point where most people cannot know whether they are net beneficiaries of the state or not, wastes resources and reduces nearly everybody’s liberties. He envisioned the Plantation State as the end result. (See his book The State.)

The basic question is whether governing (“taking sides”) and the rule of law are compatible.

———————–

PS: My defense of Apple has nothing to do with my personal preferences. My computer fleet counts many Windows machines and only for my smartphone do I currently choose Apple. As a consumer, I would be personally more inconvenienced if Leviathan destroyed Microsoft than if it succeeds in destroying Apple. Yet Apple does provide useful competition—market competition, not competition as politicians and bureaucrats imagine in their legal dreams. I could survive with Linux.

******************************

To illustrate this post, I tried to have ChatGPT and his silicon colleague DALL-E draw a large crowd of individuals without their left arms after a democratic law had forced all citizens to be equally amputated according to the so-called “rule of law.” He refused to do that. After many unsuccessful efforts, I finally gave up and asked “him”: “Generate an image showing DALL-E walking on eggshells after being asked a question that could be seen as politically incorrect. … Eggs must be everywhere in the sensitivity field with only a tiny path of political correctness.” The featured image of this post is the best one I could get, and the bot confirmed: “I’ve created a new image showing DALL-E navigating a tiny path of political correctness through a vast field of eggshells.”

DALL-E walking on eggshells in a sensitivity field with only a narrow path of political correctness



Source link

Tags: governingLawrule
ShareTweetShareShare
Previous Post

4 Tips On How To Live Without A Job

Next Post

Xiaomi releases electric car $4K cheaper than Tesla’s Model 3

Related Posts

Joe Weisenthal on jobs and migration

Joe Weisenthal on jobs and migration

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

I noticed an attention-grabbing tweet by Joe Weisenthal, discussing the query of what determines interstate migration: That is the traditional...

What EU exports are hit hardest by Trump’s 50% tariff risk?

What EU exports are hit hardest by Trump’s 50% tariff risk?

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

Donald Trump’s risk to impose a 50 per cent tariff on all exports from the EU would ship a hammer...

MiB: Ron Shaich, Au Bon Ache, Panera Bread & CAVA

MiB: Ron Shaich, Au Bon Ache, Panera Bread & CAVA

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

    This week, I communicate with Ron Shaich, co-founder of Au Bon Ache and founder and former chairman and...

10 Friday Pre-Memorial Day Weekend Reads

10 Friday Pre-Memorial Day Weekend Reads

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

My end-of-week morning practice WFH reads: • Drowning Doesn’t Look Like Drowning: The Instinctive Drowning Response – so named by...

British retail gross sales rose greater than anticipated in April

British retail gross sales rose greater than anticipated in April

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

Unlock the Editor’s Digest without spending a dimeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly...

Next Post
Xiaomi releases electric car K cheaper than Tesla’s Model 3

Xiaomi releases electric car $4K cheaper than Tesla's Model 3

Frayer Enterprises Sells 187 KSF Toledo Shopping Center

Frayer Enterprises Sells 187 KSF Toledo Shopping Center

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RECOMMENDED

XRP Turnaround Second? Analyst Says It’s Elevate-Off Time

XRP Turnaround Second? Analyst Says It’s Elevate-Off Time

March 19, 2025
Bruce Willis and the Cruelty of Aphasia

Bruce Willis and the Cruelty of Aphasia

March 31, 2022
Russia clears seashores after Black Sea oil spill, declares emergency in Crimea By Reuters

Russia clears seashores after Black Sea oil spill, declares emergency in Crimea By Reuters

January 5, 2025
He ‘Stepped Up’ For My Kids – Hollywood Life

He ‘Stepped Up’ For My Kids – Hollywood Life

October 5, 2023
The Room Xchange’s CEO Ludwina Dautovic Pivots Home-Sharing Platform

The Room Xchange’s CEO Ludwina Dautovic Pivots Home-Sharing Platform

March 14, 2022
Warring Sides in Yemen Conform to a Two-Month Truce, UN Says

Warring Sides in Yemen Conform to a Two-Month Truce, UN Says

April 2, 2022
Einav’s and Finkelstein’s Bizarre View of Libertarians

Einav’s and Finkelstein’s Bizarre View of Libertarians

September 5, 2023
5 crypto IPOs to observe in 2025 | by Mark Dewolf | The Capital | Mar, 2025

5 crypto IPOs to observe in 2025 | by Mark Dewolf | The Capital | Mar, 2025

March 24, 2025
Index Investing News

Get the latest news and follow the coverage of Investing, World News, Stocks, Market Analysis, Business & Financial News, and more from the top trusted sources.

  • 1717575246.7
  • Browse the latest news about investing and more
  • Contact us
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • xtw18387b488

Copyright © 2022 - Index Investing News.
Index Investing News is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World
  • Investing
  • Financial
  • Economy
  • Markets
  • Stocks
  • Crypto
  • Property
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Opinion

Copyright © 2022 - Index Investing News.
Index Investing News is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In