Two guarantees that United States (US) President-elect Donald Trump made throughout his election marketing campaign might type the core of his financial coverage: First, his promise to lift tariffs on every part that the world’s largest financial system imports by 10-20%, and second, his pledge to take manufacturing jobs from international international locations by providing incentives to encourage corporations to relocate to the US. In different phrases, the emergence of a staunchly protectionist US may very well be within the offing.

Nearly a century again, one other Republican, Herbert Hoover, received the presidential election by promising a rise in tariffs. This culminated within the adoption of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which raised tariffs by 40-60%. A commerce warfare adopted because the US’s commerce companions retaliated, and this, in flip, triggered the Nice Despair, the worst financial disaster that humankind has seen. Trump’s insistence on utilizing commerce protectionism to “Make America Nice Once more”, due to this fact, doesn’t bode properly for a worldwide financial system that’s already dealing with appreciable headwinds.
The chance of President-elect Trump implementing his guarantees on tariffs appears excessive for 2 causes. The primary is his fondness for utilizing tariffs, which he described in a latest interview: “To me, probably the most lovely phrase within the dictionary is tariff. It’s my favourite phrase”. The second purpose for Trump to financial institution on tariffs is the Biden administration’s adoption of an “industrial coverage”, lengthy banished from the lexicon of US policymakers, to drive the nation’s financial system. Biden initiated a sequence of legislative actions to assist the rebuilding of producing enterprises within the US, together with the CHIPS for America Act, the Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act, and the Inflation Discount Act of 2022. The main focus is on a number of essential industries, together with semiconductors, electronics, prescribed drugs, medical gadgets, communications gadgets, and autos and elements. These industries are prone to obtain the best precedence when Trump will get right down to constructing his protectionist wall.
It’s a no-brainer {that a} protectionist America will harm India’s pursuits. Exports to the most important market declined throughout the earlier fiscal yr and have barely recovered misplaced floor throughout the first six months of 2024-25. Extra importantly, most sectors which are the specific focus of the US’ industrial coverage are additionally these focused by India’s Manufacturing Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, that are supposed to gas exports of producing merchandise from India. In his first time period in workplace, Trump focused India for imposing excessive tariffs (he labelled India as “tariff king”), shutting out American merchandise from its market, and sustaining a commerce surplus with the US. There was stress on India to import extra from the US, together with agricultural merchandise, which India might resist to a big extent. After receiving huge assist for promising using commerce protectionism to advertise his nation’s pursuits, it could be secure to imagine that there will probably be little change in Trump’s perspective throughout the second time period. He could proceed to insist that India ranges the taking part in discipline by rising imports from its largest commerce associate. One key subject that might be essential for India, because the change of guard takes place in Washington, DC, is whether or not Trump would honour the guarantees by Biden, together with the recently-inked deal to ascertain a semiconductor fab unit in Kolkata.
One other subject that considerations India is that Trump is against strategic alliances inside the Indo-Pacific. In reality, he made a marketing campaign promise to stroll away from the Indo-Pacific Financial Framework (IPEF) for Prosperity that the US has negotiated with 13 companions, together with India. The current administration has invested closely within the IPEF as a bulwark towards the dominance of China on this area; IPEF is extensively seen as Biden’s model of “pivot to Asia”, fairly like how the Obama presidency had designed the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Settlement. However, one of many first selections that Trump made after strolling into the Oval Workplace in 2017 was the US’s withdrawal from the TPP. This was consistent with his view (expressed then) that the US would signal commerce offers solely with particular person allies. If President Trump sticks to his earlier place, geo-economic equations within the Indo-Pacific area might alter significantly.
The Trump presidency may also severely exacerbate the uncertainties that the World Commerce Group (WTO) is dealing with. The primary Trump presidency had set these uncertainties off by breaking the dispute settlement physique (DSB). Trump had refused to endorse the appointment of recent members to the Appellate Physique of the DSB, which meant that the settlement of disputes between members couldn’t be accomplished. Given his opposition to the WTO, it’s probably that the multilateral buying and selling system may very well be weakened additional in his second time period as president. If this occurs, the worldwide financial system will probably be in jeopardy as a multilateral rules-based framework is important for the orderly conduct of commerce. Within the absence of multilateral commerce guidelines, highly effective buying and selling nations would use their brute pressure to extract concessions from smaller international locations. Hedging towards such a state of affairs is what WTO guarantees. The chance of dismantling the WTO might be phenomenal.
Traditionally, bilateral financial relations between India and the US haven’t been straightforward, with the 2 international locations differing on a slew of commerce and funding points. Disagreements over mental property safety have usually reached a flashpoint, because the US commerce administration has complained that India offers insufficient ranges of safety and enforcement. These variations have endured no matter whether or not there’s a Democrat or a Republican within the White Home and should, due to this fact, play out sooner or later.
On the identical time, nevertheless, India and the US have in place a number of bilateral processes that may assist not solely in navigating via their variations but in addition strengthen their relations. However, above all, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President-elect Trump have wonderful private relations; how they work collectively to construct a greater future for each international locations will probably be watched with curiosity.
Biswajit Dhar is distinguished professor, Council for Social Improvement, and retired professor, JNU.The views expressed are private