The electrical car battery maker’s shares have continued to slip even because it touts the advantages of a just lately acquired provider that may sharply increase its income.
One can hype up a head-scratching choice solely a lot. Electrical car battery maker CBAK Power Know-how Inc. (NASDAQ:CBAT) is doing simply that, attempting to place a constructive spin on a latest acquisition that appears extra troublesome than useful for the corporate. Regardless of its efforts, traders stay unimpressed.
In a March 17 announcement, the lithium-ion battery maker touted the nice efficiency of Zhejiang Meidu Hitrans Lithium Battery Know-how Co., a troubled provider of battery supplies that CBAK acquired within the third quarter of final yr.
CBAK stated Hitrans’ income for the primary 9 months of final yr totaled $97.9 million, about 4 instances what CBAK itself introduced in throughout the identical interval. Hitrans earned $11 million in gross revenue and $4.2 million in working revenue in the course of the interval, whereas CBAK made an working loss. CBAK stated it should begin together with Hitrans’ financials in its personal stories this yr, anticipating the brand new unit’s “wonderful outcomes” will considerably increase the U.S.-listed firm’s revenue.
However regardless of the fluffy language, CBAK shares dropped 6% within the following two days after the announcement, extending their decline from a peak final June. Maybe traders had been feeling much less upbeat after studying the superb print of a submitting with the Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) submitted the identical day because the press launch.
For starters, this acquisition, which was first introduced in a three-paragraph assertion again in July and value CBAK about 158.74 million yuan ($24.6 million), is something however unusual. In accordance with the SEC submitting, earlier than the acquisition by CBAK, Hitrans was 60% owned by an organization referred to as Zhejiang Meidu Graphene Know-how. Some Hitrans executives, together with its CEO, held 25% of the corporate, and a enterprise named New Period Group Zhejiang New Power Supplies owned the remainder.
After Hitrans didn’t pay New Period on time for some belongings, together with land use rights, crops and tools, New Period had a courtroom freeze the 60% stake held by Meidu Graphene, which was a guarantor for Hitrans. The 25% stake held by Hitrans executives was additionally frozen as a result of it was getting used as collateral for defaulted debt they owed to Zhejiang Meidu Pawn Co. Ltd., which seems to be an affiliate of Meidu Graphene.
A person named Ye Junnan turned an middleman to take over a lot of the frozen shares whereas the messy state of affairs was sorted out. CBAK first purchased a 21.56% stake in Hitrans for 40.74 million yuan from Ye, who used the proceeds to repay the debt owed by Hitrans executives to Meidu Pawn.
CBAK then took a collection of steps to unfreeze the 60% stake held by Meidu Graphene, together with extending a mortgage to Hitrans that in the end paved the best way for Ye to accumulate the shares. As soon as these shares had been unfrozen, CBAK then acquired them from Ye for 118 million yuan. In any case that, Hitrans then owed Ye 180 million yuan, which it agreed to repay by the top of final yr.
It’s not clear how Hitrans, below its new CBAK possession, deliberate to fulfill the duty to Ye with out sufficient money of its personal readily available. It’s potential CBAK could have supplied some monetary help, which the corporate could talk about when it releases its 2021 outcomes this Thursday.
Bailout
Merely put, CBAK’s elaborate steps amounted to a bailout of Hitrans, whose financials deteriorated considerably in 2020. In accordance with CBAK’s March 17 SEC submitting, Hitrans’ income dropped about 27% in 2020 and its web money move from operations turned unfavorable. CBAK, together with an organization whose board members embody a former CEO of CBAK, was a serious buyer of Hitrans that yr, however enterprise between the 2 seems to have dwindled since then.
Hitrans’ present liabilities exceeded its present belongings in 2020, which implies it had unfavorable working capital and its means to pay short-term debt was in jeopardy.
Hitrans’ enterprise did get well final yr, with income for January-September already surpassing that for all of 2020. But it nonetheless appears to be on shaky footing. Regardless of the income development, the corporate’s unfavorable money move really elevated in the course of the 9 months from the identical interval of 2020, whereas its money spending for funding greater than quadrupled.
Now the onus is on CBAK to assist enhance Hitrans’ unfavorable money move. However that could possibly be problematic since CBAK’s personal funds aren’t actually in fine condition both. CBAK additionally reported unfavorable money move from operations within the first 9 months of final yr, and the cash it spent to take over Hitrans far exceeded its money on the finish of 2020.
To fund the Hitrans transaction, CBAK issued new shares – quite a lot of them. Via September final yr, it raised about $65.5 million by promoting new shares, representing a serious dilution for current shareholders of an organization whose market worth is now nearly $100 million. The corporate was really value much more earlier than the massive dilution, which put CBAK’s shares on a downward observe that noticed them lose two-thirds of their worth from earlier than the transaction was first introduced.
The marketplace for electrical car batteries in China is booming as Beijing throws its weight behind environmentally pleasant vehicles. That drive has been a boon for Modern Amperex Know-how Co., Ltd. (300750.SZ), or CATL, which has turn into not solely China’s however the world’s high battery maker, commanding a sky-high price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 110 and a equally hefty price-to-sale (P/S) ratio of greater than 20.
On the identical time, although, the battery market in China is fiercely aggressive, stuffed with small producers like CBAK. Regardless that the market is large and additional increasing, CBAK’s clientele seems small, with a handful of consumers accounting for greater than half of its income within the first 9 months of final yr. Which means that the lack of only one key buyer would go away an enormous gap in its income.
So, it’s not exhausting to see why CBAK has fallen out of favor with traders. Its shares commerce at a P/S ratio of lower than 3 based mostly on its income for 2020, a fraction of the a number of for CATL. A part of the hole could owe to CBAK’s itemizing within the U.S., which has turn into an more and more hostile marketplace for Chinese language shares. CATL is listed in Shenzhen. There isn’t any trailing P/E ratio for CBAK inventory as a result of the corporate misplaced cash in 2020 and has but to report last 2021 earnings.
Reaching higher vertical integration by buying a provider like Hitrans can theoretically deliver some advantages for CBAK, comparable to regular provide of supplies. However on the identical time, as anybody can think about, including collectively two financially struggling corporations actually simply creates a fair bigger struggling firm.
Disclosure: None.
Unique Put up
Editor’s Word: The abstract bullets for this text had been chosen by Searching for Alpha editors.